Tunisia vs Japan World Cup 2026 Preview
Table of Contents Show
Tunisia face Japan in a FIFA World Cup 2026 Group F match at Monterrey Stadium in Guadalupe, Monterrey, Mexico, on Saturday, 20 June 2026 local time. Kick-off is scheduled for 10:00 p.m. Monterrey time and 04:00 UTC on Sunday, 21 June. This is Match 36 and the second group-stage match for both teams.
Tunisia enter under heavy pressure after a 5-1 opening defeat against Sweden. The Tunisian federation changed direction after that loss, with Hervé Renard taking charge before the Japan match. Japan enter with one point after a 2-2 draw with the Netherlands, where Hajime Moriyasu’s side came from behind twice and scored late through Daichi Kamada’s deflected equaliser. Japan’s confirmed squad context includes Zion Suzuki, Takehiro Tomiyasu, Ko Itakura, Wataru Endo, Ao Tanaka, Ritsu Doan, Daichi Kamada, Takefusa Kubo, Takumi Minamino, Koki Ogawa and Daizen Maeda. Kaoru Mitoma was not selected because of injury.
The likely tactical shape is Tunisia defending more compactly under Renard, while Japan control more of the ball through technical midfielders and flexible wide rotations. The key matchup is Tunisia’s rebuilt defensive block against Japan’s Doan-Kubo-Kamada creative line. Japan are market favourites, but betting markets are risk signals only and do not guarantee the result.

| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Match | Tunisia vs Japan |
| Competition | FIFA World Cup 2026 |
| Stage | First Stage / Group Stage |
| Group | Group F |
| Match Number | Match 36 |
| Date | Saturday, 20 June 2026 local time / Sunday, 21 June 2026 UTC |
| Kick-off Time | 10:00 p.m. Monterrey time / 04:00 UTC |
| Stadium | Monterrey Stadium |
| Common Venue Context | Estadio Monterrey / Estadio BBVA, Guadalupe |
| City | Guadalupe / Monterrey metropolitan area |
| Host Country | Mexico |
| Expected Attendance | Not available from verified public data |
| Referee | Not available from verified official public data |
| VAR | Not available from verified official public data |
| Weather Forecast | Around 77°F / 25°C near local kick-off; mostly cloudy; thunderstorm risk earlier in the evening and around midnight; exact pitch speed not available from verified public data |
| Pitch Context | Football-specific stadium context; exact match pitch speed not available from verified public data |
| Main Article Focus | Tunisia’s emergency reset, Japan’s qualification opportunity, predicted lineups, tactical matchups, Monterrey weather, projected stats, card risk, group scenarios and responsible betting analysis |
Tunisia vs Japan is a pressure match with different psychological weights. Tunisia need a reaction after a heavy defeat and a coaching change. Japan need to turn a strong draw against the Netherlands into a win that can move them close to the Round of 32. The match is not only about technical quality. It is also about emotional control, heat management, defensive repair, substitutions and whether Tunisia can survive Japan’s rotations long enough to create counterattacking pressure.
Tunisia vs Japan matters because Japan can move to four points and take a major step toward qualification, while Tunisia need at least a positive result to keep their Group F route alive after a damaging opening defeat.
| Category | Status | Tunisia vs Japan Example | Article Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmed fact | Verified before publication | Tunisia vs Japan, Group F, Match 36, Monterrey Stadium | |
| Confirmed timing | Verified fixture context | 20 June 2026 local time / 21 June 2026 UTC, 10:00 p.m. local / 04:00 UTC | |
| Confirmed Tunisia result | Verified reporting | Tunisia lost 5-1 to Sweden | |
| Confirmed Japan result | Verified reporting | Japan drew 2-2 with the Netherlands | |
| Announced information | Verified reporting | Hervé Renard replaced Sabri Lamouchi before the Japan match | |
| Confirmed Japan team context | Verified reporting | Japan squad includes Takehiro Tomiyasu and Wataru Endo; Kaoru Mitoma was not selected | |
| Confirmed Group F context | Verified fixture table | Sweden lead after beating Tunisia; Japan and Netherlands have one point each before later updates | |
| Probable information | Tactical forecast | Japan likely control more possession; Tunisia likely rebuild a compact defensive plan | |
| Projected data | Model-based estimate | Possession, shots, xG, corners, fouls, cards and substitutions | |
| Unknown data | Not verified in current source set | Expected attendance, official referee, official VAR, exact humidity, exact wind and exact pitch speed | |
| Scenario-based analysis | Forecast only | Tunisia may change formation under Renard; Japan may rotate striker or wide roles |
This distinction matters because the match invites extreme narratives. Tunisia’s 5-1 defeat is confirmed. It does not guarantee another heavy defeat. Japan’s draw with the Netherlands is confirmed. It does not guarantee a win against Tunisia. A coaching change is confirmed. It does not guarantee an immediate tactical fix. A predicted lineup is not an official team sheet. A betting price is not a result.
This preview uses probability language. It does not state that a goal, card, injury, substitution or VAR decision will happen at a specific minute. The match can change through an early goal, a set piece, a weather shift, a red card, a goalkeeper error, a tactical surprise, or a late team-sheet decision.
Group F had a sharp first matchday. Sweden beat Tunisia 5-1 and took the early lead. Japan drew 2-2 with the Netherlands and showed resilience. Tunisia now sit at the bottom with the weakest goal difference.
| Team | Played | Won | Drawn | Lost | Goals For | Goals Against | Goal Difference | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 |
| Japan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Tunisia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
This table reflects the opening-match context before later Group F results are applied. Netherlands vs Sweden is scheduled before Tunisia vs Japan, so readers should verify the latest Group F table before publication or betting decisions.
Tunisia’s tournament changed after one game. The 5-1 loss to Sweden damaged points, goal difference and defensive trust. Tunisia had entered the tournament with a reputation for defensive strength after a strong qualifying campaign. That identity collapsed against Sweden’s forwards and second-wave runners.
Hervé Renard now faces a difficult task. He does not have a full pre-tournament camp. He does not have time to rebuild every attacking pattern. He can, however, simplify the plan. Tunisia need compact distances, clearer marking, better emotional control and a direct route after regains.
Tunisia’s practical objectives:
Japan left the Netherlands match with mixed emotions. A 2-2 draw against a European power is a strong result. Coming from behind twice shows resilience. But Moriyasu also described the result as disappointing because Japan believed they could have won.
That detail matters. Japan should not treat Tunisia as a routine task. Tunisia are hurt, but hurt teams can become more compact and more dangerous. Japan need to combine patience with urgency. A win would put them on four points and make the final match against Sweden more manageable. A draw would keep them alive but leave pressure. A defeat would undo the positive Netherlands result.
Japan’s practical objectives:
Tunisia’s goal difference is already a major problem. A second defeat could leave them almost dependent on an unlikely final-round combination. Japan are level on goal difference and can improve their position with a win.
This affects late decisions. If Japan lead by one, they may still push for control rather than margin. If Tunisia trail by one, they must decide whether chasing a draw is worth risking a second or third goal. A 1-0 defeat and a 3-0 defeat have different third-place implications.
The expanded 48-team format keeps third-place teams alive. The best eight third-placed teams qualify for the Round of 32. Four points after two matches would be a strong platform for Japan. One point after two matches would leave Japan exposed. Three points after two matches would give Tunisia a route. Zero or one point after two matches would leave Tunisia in a weak position.
The third-place route makes risk management important. Tunisia cannot ignore goal difference. Japan cannot assume a draw is enough.
Tunisia carry crisis pressure. Japan carry opportunity pressure. Tunisia must show pride and structure. Japan must show maturity and finishing quality. If Tunisia hold the match level after 30 minutes, the pressure can shift slightly toward Japan. If Japan score early, Tunisia’s confidence can break again.
| Result | Tunisia Impact | Japan Impact | Group F Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia win | Tunisia move to three points and revive their tournament | Japan stay on one point and face Sweden under pressure | Group F becomes unstable |
| Draw | Tunisia move to one point but remain in a weak position | Japan move to two points and still need a final-round result | Japan remain alive but miss a major chance |
| Japan win | Tunisia stay on zero points and face severe final-round pressure | Japan move to four points and take a strong qualification step | Japan gain control before Sweden |
| Factor | Match Relevance |
|---|---|
| Host country | Mexico |
| Venue region | Nuevo León / northern Mexico |
| City context | Guadalupe, Monterrey metropolitan area |
| Neutral match | Neither team is host nation |
| Crowd profile | Japanese support, Tunisian support, Mexican neutrals |
| Climate | Warm late evening with cloud and storm risk |
| Altitude | Moderate elevation compared with sea level, but not a major high-altitude match |
| Stadium context | Football-specific venue context |
| Travel context | Tunisia stay in Monterrey after Sweden match; Japan travel from Dallas / Arlington opener context |
| Tournament pressure | Second group match with survival and qualification implications |
Monterrey gives the match a distinct environment. The late kick-off reduces direct heat, but the city can remain warm and humid. The possible storm context increases uncertainty. Tunisia have venue familiarity from their Sweden opener. Japan have to adapt after playing the Netherlands in Texas.
| City Factor | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|
| 10:00 p.m. local kick-off | Lower direct heat than afternoon, but late rhythm affects body clock |
| Around 77°F / 25°C near kick-off | Moderate running load, but humidity and storm risk can matter |
| Mostly cloudy | Lower direct sunlight, stable visual conditions |
| Thunderstorm risk earlier and near midnight | Possible disruption to warm-up, pitch speed, fan movement or late match conditions |
| Stadium-specific crowd | Compact, intense football atmosphere |
| Time-zone context | Japan face a long body-clock adjustment; Tunisia also adapt to Mexico conditions |
| Travel load | Japan travel from Texas; Tunisia remain in Monterrey environment |
| Emotional environment | Tunisia crisis, Japan opportunity |
The late kick-off helps avoid extreme daytime heat. It does not remove fatigue. Tunisia may defend for long stretches. Japan may press and counter-press. Both plans require repeated sprinting and clear communication.
| Stadium Detail | Data |
|---|---|
| FIFA Stadium Name | Monterrey Stadium |
| Common Venue Context | Estadio Monterrey / Estadio BBVA |
| City | Guadalupe / Monterrey metropolitan area |
| State | Nuevo León |
| Host Country | Mexico |
| Kick-off | 10:00 p.m. local / 04:00 UTC |
| Expected Attendance | Not available from verified public data |
| Referee | Not available from verified official public data |
| VAR | Not available from verified official public data |
| Roof Status | Open-air stadium context |
| Pitch Speed | Not available from verified public data |
| Tactical Impact | Late weather, pitch moisture, wide channels and crowd pressure should be checked close to kick-off |
Monterrey Stadium is a purpose-built football venue. That can support atmosphere, pressing energy and wide attacking rhythm. The biggest unknown is match-hour surface condition if storms affect the area.
| Weather / Environment Factor | Tactical Meaning |
|---|---|
| Around 77°F / 25°C | Pressing is possible, but humidity can still drain legs |
| Mostly cloudy | Lower visual glare and direct heat |
| Thunderstorm risk | Ball speed, goalkeeper handling and concentration can shift |
| Exact humidity unavailable | Avoid precise cramp claims |
| Wind not fully verified | Crosses, long diagonals and goalkeeper kicks need live reading |
| Open-air venue | Weather remains a live variable |
| Moderate elevation | Not a decisive altitude match, but recovery should still be managed |
| Late kick-off | Substitution timing may reflect energy and concentration |
The most important weather factor is storm risk. Japan’s passing game depends on timing and surface speed. Tunisia’s defensive survival depends on clearances, goalkeeper handling and compact movement. If the pitch becomes slick, rebounds and second balls gain value.
| Team | Player / Role | Status | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | Hervé Renard | New head coach before Japan match | Likely simpler defensive plan and emotional reset |
| Tunisia | Sabri Lamouchi | Removed after Sweden defeat | Explains tactical reset and uncertainty |
| Tunisia | Aymen Dahmen / Bechir Ben Said / goalkeeper pool | Goalkeeper options | Starter must handle pressure after heavy defeat |
| Tunisia | Montassar Talbi | Centre-back reference | Defensive organisation and aerial duels |
| Tunisia | Ali Abdi | Full-back / wing-back profile | Wide defending and possible forward support |
| Tunisia | Ellyes Skhiri | Midfielder | Defensive balance, second balls and tempo |
| Tunisia | Hannibal Mejbri | Midfielder | Energy, ball carrying and emotional edge |
| Tunisia | Mohamed Ali Ben Romdhane | Midfielder | Link play and late box movement |
| Tunisia | Elias Saad | Attacker | Direct transition option |
| Tunisia | Seifeddine Jaziri | Forward | Central striker / pressure outlet |
| Japan | Hajime Moriyasu | Head coach | Flexible structure, strong mentality and technical control |
| Japan | Zion Suzuki | Goalkeeper | Distribution, command and shot-stopping |
| Japan | Takehiro Tomiyasu | Returned to squad | Defensive flexibility and experience |
| Japan | Ko Itakura | Defender | Centre-back organisation and aerial duels |
| Japan | Wataru Endo | Midfielder | Leadership and ball-winning |
| Japan | Ao Tanaka | Midfielder | Box arrivals and circulation |
| Japan | Ritsu Doan | Midfielder / winger | Inside movement and chance creation |
| Japan | Daichi Kamada | Midfielder / attacker | Late equaliser context and central creativity |
| Japan | Takefusa Kubo | Attacker | Dribbling, final pass and right-side/central creativity |
| Japan | Takumi Minamino | Attacker | Between-line movement and scoring threat |
| Japan | Kaoru Mitoma | Not selected | Removes elite left-side dribbling option |
| Player | Team | Status | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not available from verified public data | Tunisia | No specific match-day doubtful player confirmed in current source set | Official team sheet and Renard press update should be checked |
| Takehiro Tomiyasu | Japan | Returned to squad after long injury absence; match role should be checked | May start, rotate, or be managed depending on fitness and tactical need |
| Not available from verified public data | Japan | No other specific match-day doubtful player confirmed in current source set | Official team sheet required |
| Player | Team | Status | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Mitoma | Japan | Not selected because of hamstring injury | Japan lose an elite left-wing dribbling and carry threat |
| Not available from verified public data | Tunisia | No confirmed match-specific absence used in this preview | Official team sheet required |
| Not available from verified public data | Japan | No additional confirmed unavailable player used in this preview | Official team sheet required |
| Player / Group | Team | Issue | Match Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia defensive line | Tunisia | Structural collapse vs Sweden, not a medical issue | Renard likely simplifies roles and distances |
| Tunisia midfield | Tunisia | High workload against Japan’s rotations | Skhiri, Hannibal and support midfielders must protect the centre |
| Japan full-backs / wing-backs | Japan | High running load in possession and transitions | Must avoid leaving counter space |
| Takehiro Tomiyasu | Japan | Fitness management after long absence | Minutes and role should be checked |
| Wataru Endo | Japan | Leadership and physical workload | May be used for control, late protection or starting stability |
| Japan attacking line | Japan | Mitoma absence changes left-side creation | Kubo, Doan, Minamino, Maeda and others carry more creative load |
| Team | Confirmed Suspension | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | Not available from verified public data | No confirmed active suspension used in this preview |
| Japan | Not available from verified public data | No confirmed active suspension used in this preview |
Tunisia’s biggest change is the coach, not a confirmed player absence. Renard may not overhaul the whole team. He can change the structure, the emotional tone and the defensive priorities. Tunisia may move from an unstable approach against Sweden toward a clearer block with fewer gaps between lines.
Japan’s biggest team-news issue is Mitoma’s absence from the squad. Japan still have major technical quality, but they lose one of the world’s strongest one-vs-one wide players. That places more creative weight on Kubo, Doan, Kamada, Minamino and the wing-back or full-back roles.
Tomiyasu’s presence gives Japan defensive flexibility. He can help at centre-back or full-back depending on the shape. His role should be confirmed from the official lineup.
Official starting lineups were not available from verified public data at the time of writing. The following XIs are projections based on squad context, opener performance and tactical logic.
| Position / Line | Player | Likely Role |
|---|---|---|
| GK | Aymen Dahmen / Bechir Ben Said | Goalkeeper, cross handling and emotional reset |
| RB / RWB | Wajdi Kechrida / Raed Bouchniba profile | Wide defending against Japan’s left rotations |
| CB | Montassar Talbi | Defensive leader, aerial duels and box organisation |
| CB | Yassine Meriah / Dylan Bronn / Nader Ghandri profile | Centre-back cover and first-contact defending |
| LB / LWB | Ali Abdi | Left-side defending and occasional forward support |
| DM | Ellyes Skhiri | Defensive screen, second balls and tempo control |
| CM | Hannibal Mejbri | Energy, pressing and ball carrying |
| CM | Mohamed Ali Ben Romdhane / Aïssa Laïdouni profile | Link play, duels and support runs |
| RW | Elias Saad / Anis Ben Slimane profile | Transition outlet and wide pressure |
| ST | Seifeddine Jaziri / Haythem Jouini profile | Central outlet and box reference |
| LW | Hamza Rafia / Youssef Msakni-type creative profile if selected | Ball retention and final-third support |
| Position / Line | Player | Likely Role |
|---|---|---|
| GK | Zion Suzuki | Goalkeeper, distribution and command |
| RB / RCB | Yukinari Sugawara / Takehiro Tomiyasu | Right-side buildup, defensive cover and overlap timing |
| CB | Ko Itakura | Centre-back organisation and aerial duels |
| CB | Takehiro Tomiyasu / Hiroki Ito / Shogo Taniguchi | Defensive flexibility and recovery cover |
| LB / LWB | Junya Ito / Yuto Nagatomo / left-sided profile depending on shape | Width, crossing and defensive work |
| DM | Wataru Endo / Koki Sano | Ball-winning, leadership and screen |
| CM | Ao Tanaka | Box runs, circulation and second balls |
| AM | Daichi Kamada | Central creativity and late-arrival threat |
| RW / AM | Ritsu Doan | Inside movement, shooting and combination play |
| LW / AM | Takefusa Kubo / Takumi Minamino | Dribbling, final pass and chance creation |
| ST | Koki Ogawa / Daizen Maeda / Ayase Ueda profile | Box movement, pressing and depth |
| Team | Base Formation | In Possession | Out of Possession | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | 4-1-4-1 / 5-4-1 / 4-3-3 | Direct 2-3-5 only in selected counters; midfield stays compact | Compact 5-4-1 or 4-5-1 defensive block | Medium |
| Japan | 3-4-2-1 / 4-2-3-1 / 4-3-3 | 2-3-5 or 3-2-5 with Kubo, Doan and Kamada between lines | 4-4-2 press or 5-4-1 protection if leading | Medium |
| Scenario | Trigger | Expected Change |
|---|---|---|
| Tunisia use back five | Renard prioritises defensive repair | Extra centre-back protects central lane |
| Tunisia use 4-1-4-1 | Renard wants compact midfield without giving up wide outlets | Skhiri anchors behind Hannibal and Ben Romdhane |
| Tunisia start a direct winger | Need counterattacking threat | Elias Saad or similar profile becomes important |
| Tunisia add striker late | Chasing result after 60’ | More direct balls and set-piece pressure |
| Japan start Tomiyasu | Moriyasu wants defensive security | Right-back or centre-back balance improves |
| Japan start Endo | Moriyasu wants experience and ball-winning | Japan gain central control and leadership |
| Japan use Maeda | Need pressing and runs behind Tunisia | Higher pressing and direct speed increase |
| Japan use Ogawa | Need box reference | Crosses, cutbacks and penalty-area presence increase |
| Japan add Minamino late | Need final-third combinations | More between-line movement and late scoring threat |
| Phase | Expected Pattern |
|---|---|
| Build-up | Pragmatic, low-risk, with Skhiri and centre-backs avoiding central turnovers |
| Attack | Direct counters, wide outlets, set pieces and second balls |
| Defense | Compact block, reduced spacing between lines and stronger box protection |
| Transitions | First forward pass into Saad, Jaziri, Hannibal or wide runner |
| Set Pieces | Talbi, centre-backs, Jaziri and midfield runners attack deliveries |
| Weakness | Confidence after Sweden defeat, defensive spacing, chance creation and recovery if Japan score early |
Tunisia should not try to dominate the ball. That would likely help Japan. The better plan is pragmatic. Use centre-backs and Skhiri to avoid panic. Play forward when Japan press high. Use diagonals only when wide players are ready to chase. Keep the midfield close to second balls.
The key build-up rule is simple: do not lose the ball centrally. Japan can counter-press quickly. If Tunisia give away central passes, Japan can create chances before the defensive block resets.
Tunisia’s build-up should aim for:
Tunisia may press in moments, but they cannot chase Japan for 90 minutes. Renard may prefer a middle block with clear triggers.
Useful Tunisia pressing triggers:
Tunisia must avoid late fouls. Japan have enough technical players to punish free kicks and restarts.
Tunisia’s main attacking side should be the side with the fastest outlet. If Saad starts, he may become a key transition runner. If Abdi advances, the left side can produce crosses. If Hannibal drifts right or left, he can support the first counter pass.
Tunisia need to avoid isolated forwards. Jaziri or another striker cannot fight three Japanese defenders alone. One midfielder must move close after each long pass.
Skhiri is the key stabilising passer. Hannibal is the key ball carrier. Ben Romdhane or Laïdouni-type midfielders can connect the second phase. Tunisia’s most important pass may be the first forward pass after a regain.
Transition is Tunisia’s main route. Japan will likely have more of the ball. Tunisia must counter with enough support.
The ideal Tunisia transition:
Tunisia can use set pieces to reduce Japan’s technical advantage. Talbi and other centre-backs can attack corners. Jaziri can contest aerial balls. Midfielders can hunt rebounds.
Set pieces also help Tunisia slow the match. That matters after a heavy opener.
The main weakness is trust. Tunisia conceded five against Sweden. Defensive players may hesitate. Renard must reduce complexity and restore clarity.
The second weakness is between-line defending. Japan can overload central pockets with Kubo, Doan, Kamada and Minamino. Tunisia’s midfield and centre-backs must pass runners on cleanly.
Tunisia’s goalkeeper must be calm. Long kicks should have targets. Short passes should not invite Japanese pressure. Cross handling is important because Japan may attack wide and produce cutbacks.
Tunisia’s full-backs should defend first. They can support attacks only when the ball is secure. If both push high, Japan’s counter-press can exploit the space.
The striker must hold the ball, draw fouls and give Tunisia relief. Goals are important, but hold-up value may be more important in the first hour. Tunisia need the forward to help the team breathe.
| Phase | Expected Pattern |
|---|---|
| Build-up | Suzuki, centre-backs, Endo/Tanaka and rotating full-backs or wing-backs |
| Attack | Kubo, Doan, Kamada and Minamino-type players receive between lines |
| Defense | Counter-press, compact rest defence and quick recovery into midfield block |
| Transitions | Fast release to Maeda, Kubo, Doan or striker after regain |
| Set Pieces | Kamada, Doan, Kubo and centre-backs attack second balls and delivery |
| Weakness | Can overcommit against low block, Mitoma absence reduces left-side dribbling, physical set-piece defence |
Japan should build with patience and speed. They should not rush because Tunisia may sit deep. They should not become slow because a deep block gets stronger when the ball moves at walking pace.
Japan’s first phase can use Suzuki, Itakura, Tomiyasu and midfield support. Endo can anchor if selected. Tanaka can advance. Kamada can receive in pockets. Kubo and Doan can rotate wide and inside. The striker must pin centre-backs.
Useful Japan build-up routes:
Japan can press Tunisia, but they must avoid turning the match into chaos. A controlled press can force Tunisia long. Then Japan can win second balls.
Useful Japan pressing triggers:
The counter-press is essential. If Japan lose the ball with full-backs high, Tunisia can break into space.
Japan’s main attacking side can change depending on Kubo and Doan. Kubo can start right or central and drift inside. Doan can cut in and shoot. Kamada can connect central zones. Without Mitoma, Japan need more shared creation from multiple players.
Japan should attack both half-spaces. Tunisia will expect central rotations, so wide switches and cutbacks are important.
Kamada is a key final-third connector. Kubo is the most dangerous creative dribbler and passer. Doan is the inside-shot and combination threat. Endo or Tanaka can provide stability. Japan do not need one single passer. They need synchronized movement.
Japan can create transitions from their press. Tunisia may give the ball away when trying to build. Japan should attack quickly after regains, but only when the lane is clear. Forced shots from bad angles can help Tunisia recover.
Japan are technically strong on set pieces, but Tunisia may have aerial size. Japan should use movement, blockers and second balls rather than relying only on direct aerial dominance.
Kamada, Doan or Kubo-type delivery can create danger. Centre-backs such as Itakura and Tomiyasu can attack the ball.
Japan’s main weakness is physical transition and set-piece defence. Tunisia may not create much from open play, but one corner or one direct ball can create pressure. Japan must not allow easy restarts.
The second weakness is over-control. Japan can dominate territory but fail to create enough clear shots if Tunisia’s block holds. They need patience and penalty-box presence.
Suzuki can help Japan build from the back. He must also judge when to go long. Tunisia may press selectively. Safe distribution can prevent emotional momentum for Tunisia.
Japan’s wide defenders can push high, but they must stagger. One side can advance. The far side should protect against Tunisia counters. Tomiyasu can help this balance if selected.
Japan’s striker role depends on the plan. Ogawa gives penalty-box presence. Maeda gives pressing and depth. Ueda gives movement and finishing if selected. The striker must occupy centre-backs and create space for Kubo, Doan and Kamada.
| Zone | Tunisia Edge | Japan Edge | Likely Control | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia left / Japan right | Abdi and wide counter route | Kubo/Doan rotations and Japan full-back support | Japan | Japan can overload this lane |
| Tunisia right / Japan left | Direct outlet after regains | Japan combinations and switches | Japan | Tunisia need one stable counter side |
| Central midfield | Skhiri, Hannibal physical energy | Endo/Tanaka/Kamada control | Japan | Decides tempo and counter prevention |
| Penalty box | Tunisian aerial targets | Japan movement and shot quality | Balanced | Low-block match may be decided here |
| Set pieces | Tunisia aerial route | Japan delivery and second balls | Balanced | Tunisia’s best route may be restarts |
| Transitions | Tunisia direct counters | Japan counter-press | Japan if rest defence works | Main upset route for Tunisia |
| Defensive third | Tunisia likely defend longer | Japan defend fewer phases | Tunisia under pressure | Tests Renard’s emergency structure |
Skhiri must protect the space in front of Tunisia’s defence. Kamada can receive there and connect Japan’s attack.
Why it matters: If Kamada turns freely, Japan can create central chances. If Skhiri blocks him, Japan may be forced wide.
What to watch: Kamada’s first touch between Tunisia’s midfield and centre-backs.
Risk trigger: If Skhiri receives an early yellow card, Tunisia’s central protection weakens.
Hannibal gives Tunisia energy and ball carrying. Endo gives Japan leadership and ball-winning if selected.
Why it matters: Tunisia need someone who can move the ball forward after recoveries.
What to watch: Whether Hannibal carries into space or loses the ball under pressure.
Risk trigger: If Hannibal draws fouls or beats pressure, Tunisia can gain territory.
Kubo can dribble, pass and shoot. Tunisia must close him without overcommitting.
Why it matters: Japan need a player who can break a compact block without Mitoma.
What to watch: Whether Kubo receives isolated one-vs-one or with two Tunisian defenders around him.
Risk trigger: If Tunisia’s left-side defender is booked early, Japan may attack that lane repeatedly.
Talbi must organise Tunisia’s defensive line and handle Japan’s central forward.
Why it matters: Japan’s attacking midfielders need a striker who occupies centre-backs.
What to watch: Whether Talbi steps out to follow the striker or stays compact.
Risk trigger: If Talbi is pulled away from the box, Japan’s runners can attack the gap.
Doan’s inside movement can drag Tunisia’s block out of shape.
Why it matters: Doan can create shots and overloads from the right half-space.
What to watch: Whether Tunisia pass him between full-back and midfielder cleanly.
Risk trigger: If Doan receives on his stronger foot near the box, Japan’s shot quality rises.
| Projected Stat | Tunisia | Japan | Confidence | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 34–43% | 57–66% | Medium/high | Japan should control more ball and territory |
| Shots | 5–10 | 12–21 | Medium | Japan likely create more volume; Tunisia counter and set-piece route remains |
| Shots on Target | 1–4 | 4–8 | Medium | Japan’s technical edge should produce more clean shots |
| xG Range | 0.40–1.05 | 1.25–2.25 | Low/medium | First goal and Tunisia structure can shift chance quality |
| Big Chances | 0–2 | 1–3 | Low/medium | Japan more likely to create central chances |
| Corners | 2–5 | 5–9 | Medium | Japan territory likely creates more corners |
| Fouls | 12–18 | 8–14 | Medium | Tunisia likely defend more technical actions |
| Yellow Cards | 1–4 | 1–2 | Low/medium | Referee unknown; Tunisia defensive workload raises risk |
| Red-Card Risk | Low/medium | Low | Low | Emotional Tunisia reset can raise caution but no red is predicted |
| Offsides | 1–3 | 1–3 | Low | Both teams can attack depth |
| Saves | 3–6 | 1–3 | Medium | Tunisia goalkeeper likely busier |
| Crosses | 7–15 | 15–26 | Medium | Japan likely use width against compact block |
| Tackles | 18–30 | 12–20 | Medium | Tunisia likely defend longer spells |
| Interceptions | 10–18 | 8–14 | Medium | Tunisia block can cut central passes |
| Clearances | 24–42 | 10–20 | Medium/high | Tunisia may defend repeated Japan entries |
Japan should lead possession, shots and corners. Tunisia’s route is lower-volume but higher-emotion. One set piece, one counterattack or one Japanese mistake can change the match. Japan must turn control into clear chances. Tunisia must turn defensive survival into useful forward actions.
| Match Window | Tactical State | Physical State | Card Risk | Goal Risk | Betting Market Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1’–15’ | Japan likely control ball; Tunisia likely rebuild compact block | Warm but manageable | Low/medium | Medium | First Kubo/Doan touches, Tunisia defensive spacing |
| 16’–30’ | Japan may increase half-space pressure; Tunisia seek first counter | Defensive shifting rises for Tunisia | Medium | Medium | Japan corner count, Tunisia fouls |
| 31’–45+’ | If level, Tunisia belief rises; Japan may force more attacks | Mental pressure shifts toward Japan | Medium/high | Medium | Late first-half set pieces |
| 46’–60’ | Renard and Moriyasu may make first tactical adjustments | Reset intensity after halftime | Medium | Medium/high | Japan substitution profile, Tunisia counter threat |
| 61’–75’ | Space may open if Tunisia tire | Fatigue and concentration matter | High | Medium/high | Fresh Japan attackers, Tunisia card risk |
| 76’–90+’ | Game state dominates | Weather and nerves may matter | High | High | Draw protection, Japan winner chase, Tunisia survival |
Japan should not force the match too early. Tunisia need to show better distances than against Sweden. One clean Tunisian counter can change Japanese full-back behaviour.
Japan may begin to overload half-spaces. Tunisia’s midfield must remain connected. If Japan win repeated corners, the pressure rises.
If the match is level, Tunisia’s confidence can grow. Japan must stay patient. A late first-half set piece can be important.
This is the first major adjustment window. Renard may add legs or protection. Moriyasu may change striker profile or add another creative player.
Tunisia’s defensive fatigue can grow. Japan’s bench can change the game. Tunisia may also find more space if Japan chase too aggressively.
The final window depends on the score. Japan may need a winner. Tunisia may need to protect a point or chase survival. Card and set-piece risk increase.
| Factor | Expected Impact | Tunisia Effect | Japan Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warm late evening | Pressing possible but must be timed | Compact defending still drains energy | Japan can press in waves |
| Mostly cloudy | Lower direct heat and glare | Helps defensive concentration | Helps passing rhythm |
| Thunderstorm risk | Surface and handling can change | Clearances and goalkeeper work become harder | Short passing and cutbacks may become slicker |
| Humidity unavailable | Avoid exact cramp claims | Defensive fatigue still possible | Repeated rotations still demand energy |
| Wind not fully verified | Crosses and long balls need live calibration | Direct counters need accuracy | Switches and set pieces need adjustment |
| Open-air venue | Weather remains relevant | Must manage late changes | Must adapt pass speed |
| Moderate elevation | Not a decisive altitude match | Normal tactical planning | Normal tactical planning |
| Late kick-off | Body-clock and concentration matter | Crisis focus required | Patience required |
The most important weather factor is the storm-risk window. If rain affects the pitch, Japan’s passing can become faster but also riskier. Tunisia’s clearances and goalkeeper handling can become more difficult. Set pieces and second balls gain value.
| Player | Team | Role | Match Impact Score /10 | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellyes Skhiri | Tunisia | Midfielder | 8.7 | Main defensive screen and tempo stabiliser |
| Hannibal Mejbri | Tunisia | Midfielder | 8.4 | Energy, ball carrying and emotional response |
| Montassar Talbi | Tunisia | Centre-back | 8.3 | Defensive organisation after Sweden defeat |
| Seifeddine Jaziri | Tunisia | Striker | 7.9 | Hold-up play and penalty-box outlet |
| Ali Abdi | Tunisia | Full-back / wing-back | 7.8 | Wide defending and transition support |
| Mohamed Ali Ben Romdhane | Tunisia | Midfielder | 7.8 | Link play and second-ball role |
| Elias Saad | Tunisia | Attacker | 7.7 | Counterattacking speed option |
| Tunisia goalkeeper | Tunisia | Goalkeeper | 8.1 | Likely shot-stopping and cross-handling workload |
| Takefusa Kubo | Japan | Attacker / creator | 8.9 | Main dribbler and final-pass threat |
| Daichi Kamada | Japan | Midfielder / attacker | 8.8 | Central creativity and opener equaliser context |
| Ritsu Doan | Japan | Midfielder / winger | 8.6 | Inside movement, shooting and overloads |
| Wataru Endo | Japan | Midfielder | 8.4 | Leadership, ball-winning and match control if selected |
| Takehiro Tomiyasu | Japan | Defender | 8.3 | Defensive flexibility and experience |
| Ko Itakura | Japan | Centre-back | 8.1 | Defensive organisation and aerial duels |
| Zion Suzuki | Japan | Goalkeeper | 7.9 | Distribution and concentration |
| Koki Ogawa / Daizen Maeda | Japan | Striker profile | 8.0 | Box presence or pressing depending on selection |
Kubo is Japan’s most important attacker because he can break compact defending. Tunisia’s most important attacker is the first counter outlet, likely Saad, Hannibal, Jaziri or another direct forward depending on the XI.
Talbi is Tunisia’s key defender because he must organise the back line after a heavy defeat. Tomiyasu and Itakura are Japan’s key defensive pieces because they must prevent Tunisia counters and set-piece momentum.
Skhiri and Kamada form the central contrast. Skhiri must block Japan’s central rhythm. Kamada must find space between Tunisia’s lines.
Japan can change the match through Minamino, Maeda, Ogawa, Endo, Tomiyasu or another role-specific substitute depending on the starting XI. Tunisia can change the match through a second striker, a faster winger or an extra midfielder to protect the block.
Tunisia’s full-backs and midfield screen carry card risk against Kubo, Doan and Kamada. Japan’s centre-backs and holding midfielder carry card risk if Tunisia break into open space.
Tomiyasu is a role and minutes watchlist because of his return after a long injury period. No confirmed Tunisia match-day injury-management case was available from verified public data in this source set.
The referee and VAR were not available from verified official public data in this source set. This section uses tactical logic only.
| Discipline Factor | Forecast |
|---|---|
| Referee Style | Not available from verified official public data |
| Tactical Foul Risk | Medium/high |
| Dissent Risk | Medium because Tunisia are under pressure and Japan need a win |
| VAR Intervention Risk | Medium |
| Penalty Risk | Medium |
| Red-Card Risk | Low/medium |
| Team | Yellow-Card Range | Red-Card Risk | Main Risk Zone |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tunisia | 1–4 | Low/medium | Full-back zones and midfield fouls against Japan creators |
| Japan | 1–2 | Low | Recovery fouls after Tunisia counters |
Tunisia may carry higher card risk because they are projected to defend longer. Japan’s card risk appears if they overcommit and then stop counters.
| Set-Piece Area | Tunisia | Japan | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corners For | Talbi, centre-backs, Jaziri targets | Itakura, Tomiyasu and Suzuki command | Balanced |
| Corners Against | Must defend Itakura, Tomiyasu and Japan movement | Must defend Tunisian aerial targets | Balanced |
| Wide Free Kicks | Tunisia delivery hierarchy should be confirmed from XI | Kubo, Doan, Kamada-type delivery | Japan technical edge |
| Direct Free Kicks | Not available from verified public data | Kubo, Doan, Kamada profiles | Japan slight edge |
| Penalties | Taker hierarchy should be confirmed from official XI | Taker hierarchy should be confirmed from official XI | Unknown |
| Long Throws | Not available from verified public data | Not available from verified public data | Unknown |
| Aerial Duels | Tunisia may have size and direct targets | Japan have organisation and movement | Balanced |
Set pieces may be Tunisia’s clearest route to a goal. Japan may have better delivery variety. The decisive matchup is Tunisia’s aerial first contact against Japan’s marking and second-ball positioning.
| Area | Tunisia | Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Goalkeeper Distribution | Likely under pressure, mixed long and safe restarts | Suzuki supports controlled build-up |
| Shot-Stopping Pressure | Medium/high | Low/medium |
| Cross Handling | High against Japan wide pressure | Medium against Tunisia set pieces |
| High-Line Risk | Low if Tunisia defend deep | Medium if Japan overcommit |
| Penalty-Box Defending | Must track Japan rotations and late runners | Must track Jaziri, Talbi and set-piece targets |
| Back-Post Weakness | Possible if Tunisia over-shift to Kubo or Doan | Possible on Tunisian counters or set pieces |
| Defensive Communication | Critical after Sweden collapse | Critical against direct counters and weather shifts |
Tunisia’s goalkeeper may face the heavier workload. Suzuki may face fewer shots, but he must stay alert. In matches like this, the underdog can create only two moments and still change the result.
| Minute Window | Tunisia Possible Change | Japan Possible Change | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45’–60’ | Add defensive legs, direct winger or second striker | Add Minamino, Maeda, Endo, Tomiyasu or striker switch | Scoreline and chance quality |
| 60’–75’ | Add fresh wide runner or extra midfielder | Add pressing forward or creative attacker | Fatigue and compact-block problem |
| 75’–90’ | Protect draw/lead or chase with direct balls | Chase winner with extra attacker or protect lead with Endo/Tomiyasu profile | Group math and game state |
Tunisia will likely defend deeper and use counters. Renard may add a defender or midfielder. The risk is becoming too passive too early.
Japan should control possession and prevent emotional counters. Moriyasu may add Endo or Tomiyasu-type protection if not already on the pitch.
Japan will likely push harder because a win has large qualification value. Tunisia may view a draw as useful, but one point would still leave them under pressure. This creates late tactical tension.
| Market | Current Signal | Main Risk |
|—|—|
| Match Winner | Japan listed as favourite | Tunisia coaching change, emotional response and set-piece route |
| Double Chance | Japan or draw likely shorter | Low price may not reflect match-state volatility |
| Over/Under Goals | Public snapshot lists 2.5 goals | Japan control can suppress chaos; early goal can open match |
| BTTS | Possible but not automatic | Tunisia shot volume may be low |
| Corners | Japan corner volume likely higher | Tunisia low block can create repeated clearances |
| Cards | Medium | Tunisia defensive workload and pressure |
| Player Shots | Kubo, Doan, Kamada, Ogawa/Maeda, Hannibal, Jaziri watchlist | Official lineups matter |
| Player Cards | Tunisia full-backs, Skhiri/Hannibal, Japan recovery defenders | Referee threshold unknown |
| Trigger | Possible Market Effect |
|---|---|
| Tunisia formation under Renard | Back five can lower total and raise Japan corners |
| Japan striker choice | Ogawa vs Maeda-type decision changes shot and pressing markets |
| Tomiyasu starting status | Improves Japan defensive balance |
| Endo starting status | Improves Japan control and late-game security |
| Kubo role | Central role can increase shot/assist expectation |
| Referee announcement | Can move cards and penalty markets |
| Weather update | Storm risk can affect totals, corners and goalkeeper handling |
| Public money on Japan | Can shorten favourite price and reduce value |
| Trigger | Meaning | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Japan create central chances | Favourite model strengthens | Finishing still matters |
| Japan only create blocked crosses | Low-block risk increases | Corner volume may still rise |
| Tunisia complete early counters | Underdog route is live | One counter can overstate balance |
| Tunisia full-back booked | Japan wide attack value rises | Referee threshold may shift |
| 0-0 after 60’ | Tunisia belief rises; Japan pressure increases | Japan bench can still change match |
| Weather worsens | Randomness increases | Markets may overreact |
This preview explains match data and market behavior. It does not provide guaranteed betting advice. World Cup betting involves risk. Readers should check local gambling laws, use licensed operators, set limits and avoid chasing losses.
| Factor | How It Can Break the Forecast |
|---|---|
| Late Lineup Change | Renard may alter Tunisia’s shape or Moriyasu may rotate key Japan roles |
| Early Goal | Forces Tunisia or Japan away from base plan |
| Early Yellow Card | Changes Tunisia’s ability to defend wide creators |
| Injury | Can remove a defender, creator or counter outlet |
| VAR Penalty | Creates a non-pattern goal and changes risk appetite |
| Weather Shift | Storms can change surface speed, handling and set pieces |
| Red Card | Makes possession and xG projections less useful |
| Goalkeeper Error | Can swing a pressure match |
| Tactical Surprise | Tunisia may press higher or Japan may use a more direct striker plan |
| Market Overreaction | Japan possession can shorten prices without clear chance quality |
The forecast can fail if Tunisia score first and force Japan to chase. It can also fail if Japan score early and open the match. Weather, Renard’s changes, set pieces, card risk and finishing can all break the pre-match model.
| Scenario | Probability Band | Match Story |
|---|---|---|
| Tunisia Narrow Win | Low | Tunisia score from counter or set piece and defend with discipline |
| Draw | Low/medium | Tunisia improve structure and Japan fail to convert control |
| Japan Win | Medium/high | Japan control possession, create better chances and manage counters |
| High-Scoring Match | Medium | Early goal breaks Tunisia’s plan and creates transitions |
| Low-Scoring Match | Medium | Tunisia sit deep and Japan control but struggle for central space |
The safest scenario frame is Japan-favoured but not Japan-certain. Japan have better form, stronger structure and more creative variety. Tunisia have a new-coach reaction route and set-piece potential.
| Result | Tunisia Impact | Japan Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Tunisia Win | Tunisia reach three points and revive qualification hopes | Japan stay on one point and face Sweden under pressure |
| Draw | Tunisia reach one point but remain fragile | Japan reach two points and still need a final-round result |
| Japan Win | Tunisia stay on zero and face severe final-round pressure | Japan reach four points and take a strong step toward qualification |
Four points would put Japan in a strong position. Three points would restore Tunisia’s route. One point keeps Tunisia alive but weak. Zero points after two matches would leave Tunisia close to elimination math, depending on other Group F results.
| Data Point | Status | Source Type |
|---|---|---|
| Match Date | Confirmed | FIFA match centre / FIFA hospitality listing |
| Kick-off Time | Confirmed | FIFA UTC listing and local hospitality listing |
| Stadium | Confirmed | FIFA match centre / Reuters match page |
| City | Confirmed | FIFA / Reuters venue context |
| Group | Confirmed | FIFA / Reuters Group F context |
| Tunisia Opener Result | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Japan Opener Result | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Tunisia Coaching Change | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Japan Coach | Confirmed | Reuters squad / team context |
| Tunisia Coach | Confirmed | Reuters pre-match reporting |
| Japan Squad Context | Confirmed | Reuters squad report |
| Mitoma Status | Confirmed not selected | Reuters squad report |
| Tomiyasu Status | Confirmed squad return | Reuters squad report |
| Referee | Pending | Not available from verified official public data |
| VAR | Pending | Not available from verified official public data |
| Weather | Forecast | Weather service |
| Lineups | Projected | Editorial forecast until official team sheets |
| Injuries | Partly confirmed / partly unavailable | Mitoma confirmed absent from squad; other match absences not invented |
| Odds | Market-signal only | Public broadcaster / sportsbook snapshot |
| Projected Stats | Model-based | Editorial projection using opener context and tactical matchup |
| Minute-Window Scenarios | Scenario-based | Editorial model, not factual prediction |
This dossier uses confirmed information where available and marks unknown data clearly. It does not invent official starting XIs, expected attendance, referee assignment, VAR assignment, exact pitch speed, exact humidity, exact wind or unverified suspensions.
This preview is analytical and informational. The forecast is not a guarantee. Football includes randomness and low-probability events. Final lineups, injuries, referee decisions, VAR, weather and early goals can change the match.
Projected statistics, scoreline scenarios and betting market notes are probability-based estimates. Japan can dominate possession and still fail to win. Tunisia can create fewer chances and still score from a counter, set piece or individual action. A goalkeeper error, red card, deflection, penalty, injury or weather shift can break the pre-match model.
Betting markets move before and during the match. Readers should verify official lineups, injuries, referee information, weather conditions, pitch condition and market prices before making decisions. Readers should check local gambling laws. Readers should use licensed operators only. Readers should set spending and time limits. Readers should not chase losses. Betting should be treated as entertainment, not income.
This article does not provide guaranteed betting advice, fixed-match information, insider tips, prediction tools, risk-free picks or certain outcomes.
Tunisia vs Japan is scheduled for Saturday, 20 June 2026 local time in Monterrey. Kick-off is 10:00 p.m. Monterrey time and 04:00 UTC on Sunday, 21 June.
Tunisia vs Japan is being played at Monterrey Stadium in Guadalupe, Monterrey, Mexico. The common venue context is Estadio Monterrey / Estadio BBVA.
Official starting lineups were not available from verified public data at the time of writing. Tunisia are projected to use a compact structure with a goalkeeper from their squad pool, Montassar Talbi, Ali Abdi, Ellyes Skhiri, Hannibal Mejbri, Mohamed Ali Ben Romdhane, Elias Saad and Seifeddine Jaziri as key figures. Japan are projected to use Zion Suzuki, Ko Itakura, Takehiro Tomiyasu if selected, Wataru Endo or another holding midfielder, Ao Tanaka, Daichi Kamada, Ritsu Doan, Takefusa Kubo and a striker profile such as Koki Ogawa or Daizen Maeda.
The main tactical matchup is Tunisia’s rebuilt compact defensive block under Hervé Renard against Japan’s technical rotations through Takefusa Kubo, Ritsu Doan, Daichi Kamada and the midfield screen.
The prediction can be wrong because late lineup changes, the Tunisia coaching reset, early goals, injuries, VAR penalties, red cards, referee decisions, weather changes, set-piece goals and goalkeeper errors can change the match. This preview uses probability logic, not certainty.
[expert_review params=»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»]