Belgium vs IR Iran World Cup 2026 Preview

Belgium face IR Iran in a FIFA World Cup 2026 Group G match at Los Angeles Stadium in Inglewood, Los Angeles, California, United States, on Sunday, 21 June 2026. Kick-off is scheduled for 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time and 19:00 UTC. This is Match 39 and the second group-stage match for both teams.

Belgium enter after a 1-1 draw with Egypt. Iran enter after a 2-2 draw with New Zealand. Group G is balanced before this match because Belgium, Iran, Egypt and New Zealand each opened with one point. Belgium are coached by Rudi Garcia and carry a squad led by Thibaut Courtois, Kevin De Bruyne, Youri Tielemans, Amadou Onana, Romelu Lukaku, Leandro Trossard, Jeremy Doku and Charles De Ketelaere. Iran are coached by Amir Ghalenoei and carry a squad led by Alireza Beiranvand, Mehdi Taremi, Alireza Jahanbakhsh, Ramin Rezaeian, Saeid Ezatolahi, Saman Ghoddos and Mohammad Mohebi.

The likely tactical shape is Belgium controlling more possession through De Bruyne, Tielemans and wide attackers, while Iran defend compactly and counter through Taremi, Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh and Rezaeian. The key matchup is Belgium’s creative midfield and wide overloads against Iran’s defensive block and transition route. Belgium are market favourites, but this article gives analysis only. It does not provide guaranteed betting advice.

Match Snapshot

Field	Data
Match	Belgium vs IR Iran
Competition	FIFA World Cup 2026
Stage	First Stage / Group Stage
Group	Group G
Match Number	Match 39
Date	Sunday, 21 June 2026
Kick-off Time	12:00 p.m. Pacific Time / 19:00 UTC
Stadium	Los Angeles Stadium
Common Venue Context	SoFi Stadium, Inglewood
City	Inglewood / Los Angeles metropolitan area
Host Country	United States
Expected Attendance	Not available from verified public data
Referee	Not available from verified official public data
VAR	Not available from verified official public data
Weather Forecast	Mild Southern California matchday profile, around 19.4°C / 67°F in the wider event window; exact match-hour wind, humidity and pitch speed not available from verified public data
Pitch Context	Tournament football surface at an NFL venue adapted for World Cup football; exact pitch speed not available from verified public data
Main Article Focus	Group G pressure, Belgium’s attacking correction, Iran’s transition threat, predicted lineups, Los Angeles context, projected stats, card risk, set pieces and responsible betting market analysis

Belgium vs Iran is not a routine favourite-versus-underdog match. Belgium have the deeper squad and stronger market profile. Iran have a strong tournament identity, experienced forwards and a proven ability to turn limited possession into dangerous moments. Both teams drew their opening games. That makes the second match a leverage point, not a warm-up.

Result Stakes in One Sentence

Belgium vs IR Iran matters because both teams entered the match on one point, and the winner can take control of a wide-open Group G before the final round.

Confirmed Facts vs Forecasts

Category	Status	Belgium vs IR Iran Example	Article Use
Confirmed fact	Verified before publication	Belgium vs IR Iran, Group G, Match 39, Los Angeles Stadium
Confirmed timing	Verified fixture context	Sunday, 21 June 2026, 12:00 p.m. PT / 19:00 UTC
Confirmed Belgium opener	Verified reporting	Belgium drew 1-1 with Egypt
Confirmed Iran opener	Verified reporting	Iran drew 2-2 with New Zealand
Confirmed group context	Verified reporting	All four Group G teams opened with one point
Confirmed Belgium coach	Verified squad source	Rudi Garcia
Confirmed Iran coach	Verified squad source	Amir / Ardeshir Ghalenoei
Confirmed Belgium squad context	Verified squad source	Courtois, De Bruyne, Tielemans, Onana, Lukaku, Trossard, Doku, De Ketelaere
Confirmed Iran squad context	Verified squad source	Beiranvand, Taremi, Jahanbakhsh, Rezaeian, Ezatolahi, Ghoddos, Mohebi
Probable information	Tactical forecast	Belgium likely control more possession and territory
Projected data	Model-based estimate	Possession, shots, xG, corners, cards and substitutions
Unknown data	Not verified in current source set	Referee, VAR, expected attendance, exact humidity, exact wind, final pitch speed
Scenario-based analysis	Forecast only	Lukaku may start or remain a managed-minute option; Iran may use a compact block or deeper back five

This distinction matters because the match can be misread by market price alone. Belgium are favourites, but the favourite label is not a result. Iran conceded chances against New Zealand, but that does not mean they will defend the same way against Belgium. Belgium needed impact from the bench against Egypt, but that does not mean Lukaku must start or that he will be able to play a full match.

A projected lineup is not an official team sheet. A projected xG range is not a final statistic. A betting price is not a guarantee. A weather profile is not final pitch condition. This dossier separates confirmed facts from forecasts so the reader can see what is known, what is likely and what remains uncertain.

Why This Match Matters

Group G Pressure Before Kick-off

Group G opened with two draws. Belgium drew Egypt. Iran drew New Zealand. That means no team entered the second round with a clear advantage. The group is open, but the pressure is real.

Team	Played	Won	Drawn	Lost	Goals For	Goals Against	Goal Difference	Points
Belgium	1	0	1	0	1	1	0	1
Egypt	1	0	1	0	1	1	0	1
Iran	1	0	1	0	2	2	0	1
New Zealand	1	0	1	0	2	2	0	1

The top two teams in each group qualify directly for the Round of 32. The best eight third-placed teams also qualify. Four points after two matches create a strong route. Two points keep a team alive but not safe. One point after two matches creates heavy final-round pressure.

Belgium’s final group match is against New Zealand. Iran’s final group match is against Egypt. That makes this game a strategic pivot. A win gives either side a qualification platform. A draw keeps both alive but leaves both exposed. A loss puts the final match under serious pressure.

Belgium’s Stakes

Belgium need attacking clarity. The draw against Egypt kept them alive, but it also raised questions. Garcia has elite names, but his team must produce better rhythm, better box entries and better finishing sequences.

The central issue is balance. Belgium want De Bruyne on the ball. They want width from Doku, Trossard, Lukebakio or Saelemaekers. They want Lukaku or De Ketelaere to occupy centre-backs. They also need Tielemans, Onana or Witsel to protect against counters. If Belgium commit too many players forward, Iran can attack quickly through Taremi and the wide outlets.

Belgium’s objectives:

• move the ball faster than against Egypt;
• create early touches for De Bruyne between lines;
• stretch Iran through width, not only central combinations;
• decide how many minutes Lukaku can play;
• support the striker with runners, not isolated crosses;
• protect the counter lanes behind full-backs;
• prevent Taremi from receiving cleanly after clearances;
• avoid frustration if Iran defend deep;
• use set pieces as a pressure tool;
• win without losing tactical control.

Iran’s Stakes

Iran showed both strength and vulnerability against New Zealand. They scored twice and created real attacking moments. They also conceded two goals and allowed chances. Against Belgium, they likely need more defensive control and fewer open spaces.

Ghalenoei’s team have experience. Beiranvand gives goalkeeping leadership. Taremi gives elite penalty-box intelligence. Jahanbakhsh gives leadership and wide quality. Rezaeian gives set-piece and right-side value. Mohebi gives direct running. Ghoddos gives technical connection. Ezatolahi gives midfield strength.

Iran’s objectives:

• keep the match level in the opening phase;
• force Belgium wide and away from central shooting lanes;
• deny De Bruyne time to face forward;
• stop Doku and Trossard from attacking isolated full-backs;
• protect Beiranvand from close-range rebounds;
• use Taremi as the main outlet after recoveries;
• support Taremi quickly through Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh or Rezaeian;
• avoid cheap fouls near the box;
• manage travel and recovery load;
• treat a draw as useful but not overdefend too early.

Goal Difference Pressure

Goal difference matters because Group G started level. Belgium and Iran both entered with a neutral goal difference. A narrow win is useful. A heavy win is powerful. A heavy defeat can make third-place comparison difficult.

Belgium may chase a second goal if they lead because group ranking matters. Iran may defend margin if they trail, because goal difference can keep them alive. That creates a tactical tension in the final 20 minutes.

Third-Place Route

The expanded World Cup format makes third place relevant. A team with four points after two matches is likely in a strong position. A team with two points still has a route. A team with one point must likely win the final match.

Belgium want to avoid needing a final-day rescue. Iran want to avoid making the Egypt match a must-win under extra travel and pressure. That makes this match important even if it does not decide everything.

Psychological Pressure

Belgium carry expectation pressure. Iran carry resilience pressure. Belgium are expected to attack. Iran are expected to defend and counter. If Iran keep the match level for long enough, pressure shifts toward Belgium. If Belgium score early, Iran must decide whether to open up. If Iran score first, Belgium may have to attack a disciplined block with growing anxiety.

Result Scenario Table

Result	Belgium Impact	Iran Impact	Group G Meaning
Belgium win	Belgium move to four points and gain control before New Zealand	Iran stay on one point and face pressure before Egypt	Belgium restore favourite status
Draw	Belgium move to two points and remain under final-round pressure	Iran move to two points and stay alive before Egypt	Group remains open
Iran win	Belgium stay on one point and face a difficult final-round situation	Iran move to four points and take a major step toward qualification	Iran create a major Group G shift

Country, City, Stadium and Weather Intelligence

Host-Country Factors

Factor	Match Relevance
Host country	United States
Venue region	Southern California
City context	Inglewood / Los Angeles metropolitan area
Neutral match	Neither team is host nation
Crowd profile	Belgian support, Iranian support, large local neutral audience
Climate	Mild coastal Southern California matchday profile
Altitude	No meaningful altitude issue
Stadium context	NFL venue adapted for World Cup football
Travel context	Belgium travel from Seattle opener; Iran have had complex travel and base logistics
Tournament pressure	Second group match with qualification control at stake

Los Angeles gives the match a major-event setting. The stadium can amplify Iran’s support if their fans travel in numbers and neutral spectators respond to the underdog. Belgium’s task is to keep the match technical and controlled. Iran’s task is to make the game emotional, compact and transition-heavy.

City Factors: Los Angeles / Inglewood

City Factor	Tactical Impact
12:00 p.m. local kick-off	Daytime rhythm affects warm-up and hydration
Mild weather profile	Pressing is physically more viable than in hot venues
No altitude issue	Sprint recovery is normal
Large stadium environment	Communication and emotional control matter
Neutral but lively crowd	Momentum may swing with defensive blocks and counterattacks
Travel context	Iran’s preparation and movement have been complicated
Surface adaptation	Early touches should reveal pitch speed
Broadcast and crowd pressure	Favourite pressure rises if Belgium fail to score early

The weather is less severe than Miami, Houston or Atlanta. Belgium can press more aggressively if the team structure supports it. Iran can also counter with repeated sprints. The main physical issue is not heat. It is recovery, travel and match rhythm.

Stadium Details

Stadium Detail	Data
FIFA Stadium Name	Los Angeles Stadium
Common Venue Context	SoFi Stadium
City	Inglewood / Los Angeles area
State	California
Host Country	United States
Kick-off	12:00 p.m. PT / 19:00 UTC
Expected Attendance	Not available from verified public data
Referee	Not available from verified official public data
VAR	Not available from verified official public data
Roof Status	Stadium has a roof/canopy design; match-specific environmental setup not available from verified public data
Pitch Speed	Not available from verified public data
Tactical Impact	The venue supports fast circulation if the surface plays cleanly; both teams must calibrate early

Los Angeles Stadium is a high-profile venue. Its scale can influence communication, especially during set pieces and pressing triggers. Belgium’s defenders must talk clearly when Iran play direct. Iran’s midfielders must stay connected when Belgium switch play.

Weather Factors Into Tactical Meaning

Weather / Environment Factor	Tactical Meaning
Around 19.4°C / 67°F event-window profile	Pressing is viable
Mild conditions	Fewer heat-related constraints than some other host cities
Exact humidity unavailable	Avoid precise cramp claims
Exact wind unavailable	Long diagonals and crosses need live reading
No altitude	Normal oxygen recovery
Stadium roof/canopy context	Wind and sun may be moderated, but match-specific setup is unknown
Pitch speed unknown	First 10 minutes should guide pass weight
Travel load	Iran’s off-field logistics can affect freshness more than weather

The most important physical factor is not temperature. It is preparation and recovery. Belgium can build a controlled rhythm if they avoid frustration. Iran must manage defensive workload and make every counterattack efficient.

Team News and Availability Ledger

Confirmed Team News

Team	Player / Role	Status	Tactical Impact
Belgium	Rudi Garcia	Head coach	Must sharpen attack and manage experienced players
Belgium	Thibaut Courtois	Goalkeeper	Shot-stopping, command and distribution
Belgium	Kevin De Bruyne	Midfielder	Main chance creator and tempo director
Belgium	Youri Tielemans	Midfielder	Passing, set pieces and second-ball control
Belgium	Amadou Onana	Midfielder	Physical balance and defensive screen
Belgium	Axel Witsel	Midfielder / defensive cover	Experience and late-game control option
Belgium	Romelu Lukaku	Forward	Managed fitness context; central striker and box target
Belgium	Leandro Trossard	Forward / winger	Movement, finishing and left-side combinations
Belgium	Jeremy Doku	Winger	One-vs-one threat and width if available
Belgium	Charles De Ketelaere	Attacker / forward	Link play, height and flexible role
Belgium	Maxim De Cuyper	Defender / full-back	Width and crossing threat
Iran	Amir / Ardeshir Ghalenoei	Head coach	Compact defensive plan and transition structure
Iran	Alireza Beiranvand	Goalkeeper	Command, shot-stopping and long distribution
Iran	Mehdi Taremi	Forward / captain-level figure	Main striker, penalty-box intelligence and outlet
Iran	Alireza Jahanbakhsh	Winger / leader	Experience, wide threat and leadership
Iran	Ramin Rezaeian	Full-back / wide outlet	Set-piece quality and right-side progression
Iran	Saeid Ezatolahi	Midfielder	Defensive screen and aerial duels
Iran	Saman Ghoddos	Midfielder	Technical connection and forward passing
Iran	Mohammad Mohebi	Forward / wide player	Direct running and transition threat

Doubtful Players Table

Player	Team	Status	Tactical Impact
Romelu Lukaku	Belgium	Fitness and minutes management watchlist	Starting role or substitute timing changes Belgium’s penalty-box threat
Jeremy Doku	Belgium	Matchday availability should be checked from official team sheet	If available, Belgium gain elite one-vs-one width
Zeno Debast	Belgium	Injury concern in broader squad context	Defensive depth and rotation should be verified
Not available from verified public data	Iran	No specific match-day doubtful player confirmed in this source set	Official team sheet should be checked

Unavailable Players Table

Player	Team	Status	Tactical Impact
Sardar Azmoun	Iran	Not selected in Iran’s 26-man World Cup squad	Removes an experienced forward option; Taremi carries greater attacking weight
Not available from verified public data	Belgium	No confirmed match-specific unavailable player used in this preview	Do not invent absences
Not available from verified public data	Iran	No additional confirmed match-specific unavailable player used in this preview	Do not invent absences

Injury Watchlist

Player / Group	Team	Issue	Match Impact
Romelu Lukaku	Belgium	Fitness and managed minutes	Influences striker selection and late-game plan
Belgium wide attackers	Belgium	Availability and selection uncertainty	Changes one-vs-one threat and crossing volume
Belgium centre-backs	Belgium	Transition exposure risk, not injury	Need protection against Taremi and Mohebi
Iran defensive line	Iran	High workload forecast	Must handle De Bruyne service and wide attacks
Alireza Beiranvand	Iran	Expected workload, not injury	Likely faces pressure if Belgium dominate
Mehdi Taremi	Iran	Tactical workload, not injury	Must hold up play and attack limited chances

Suspension Risk

| Team | Confirmed Suspension | Notes |
|—|—|
| Belgium | Not available from verified public data | No confirmed active suspension used in this preview |
| Iran | Not available from verified public data | No confirmed active suspension used in this preview |

Tactical Meaning of Availability

Belgium’s most important selection question is how Garcia balances Lukaku’s penalty-box value with his managed fitness. A fully fit Lukaku changes the geometry of the attack because he pins centre-backs and creates space for De Bruyne, Trossard and wide runners. A limited Lukaku changes the plan. De Ketelaere, Trossard or another forward profile may give more movement but less classic box presence.

Iran’s biggest squad issue is Azmoun’s absence. Taremi becomes the main reference point. That makes the quality of support around him critical. If Jahanbakhsh, Mohebi, Ghoddos or Rezaeian cannot get close to Taremi after long passes, Iran will struggle to keep the ball.

Predicted Lineups and Formations

Official starting lineups were not available from verified public data at the time of writing. The following XIs are projections based on squad context, opening-match reports and tactical logic.

Belgium Predicted XI

Position / Line	Player	Likely Role
GK	Thibaut Courtois	Goalkeeper, command and distribution
RB	Timothy Castagne / Thomas Meunier	Right-side defence and support runs
CB	Zeno Debast / Koni De Winter	Buildup and recovery defending
CB	Arthur Theate / Brandon Mechele	Left-sided defending and aerial duels
LB	Maxim De Cuyper	Width, crossing and left-side progression
DM	Amadou Onana	Physical screen and second-ball control
CM	Youri Tielemans	Passing rhythm and set-piece delivery
AM	Kevin De Bruyne	Main creator and final-third passer
RW	Jeremy Doku / Dodi Lukebakio	One-vs-one threat and width
ST	Charles De Ketelaere / Romelu Lukaku	De Ketelaere for movement; Lukaku for box power
LW	Leandro Trossard	Inside movement, finishing and combination play

Iran Predicted XI

Position / Line	Player	Likely Role
GK	Alireza Beiranvand	Goalkeeper, command and long distribution
RB	Ramin Rezaeian / Aria Yousefi	Right-side defence, set pieces and forward support
CB	Shojae Khalilzadeh	Defensive leadership and aerial duels
CB	Ali Nemati / Hossein Kanaani-type profile if selected	Box defending and first contact
LB	Milad Mohammadi	Left-side defence and recovery
DM	Saeid Ezatolahi	Midfield screen and aerial protection
CM	Saman Ghoddos	Technical connection and transition passing
CM	Ahmad Noorollahi / Ali Gholizadeh-type profile if selected	Duels, cover and support runs
RW	Alireza Jahanbakhsh	Leadership, wide threat and delivery
ST	Mehdi Taremi	Main outlet, penalty-box threat and hold-up play
LW	Mohammad Mohebi / Mehdi Ghayedi	Direct running and counterattacking support

Formation Forecast Table

Team	Base Formation	In Possession	Out of Possession	Confidence
Belgium	4-2-3-1 / 4-3-3	2-3-5 with De Bruyne between lines and full-backs high	4-4-2 press or 4-2-3-1 counter-press shape	Medium
Iran	4-2-3-1 / 4-4-2 / 5-4-1	Direct 2-3-5 only in selected counters; Rezaeian and wide forwards support	Compact 5-4-1 or 4-5-1 block	Medium/high

Alternative Lineup Scenario Table

Scenario	Trigger	Expected Change
Lukaku starts	Garcia wants immediate penalty-box reference	Belgium cross earlier and pin Iran centre-backs
Lukaku stays on bench	Minutes management continues	De Ketelaere or Trossard may start centrally
Doku starts	Belgium want direct one-vs-one width	Iran’s left defensive cover faces high pressure
Doku does not start	Belgium choose control or fitness caution	Lukebakio, Trossard or Saelemaekers carry more width
Belgium add Witsel	Garcia wants late control	Midfield becomes more conservative
Iran use back five	Ghalenoei prioritises containment	Extra defender protects Beiranvand and central box
Iran use two forwards	Iran want better support for Taremi	Mohebi or Moghanlou plays closer to him
Iran chase late goal	Trailing after 70’	Jahanbakhsh, Ghayedi, Moghanlou or another forward profile becomes more important

Tactical Identity: Belgium

Belgium Tactical Table

Phase	Expected Pattern
Build-up	Courtois and centre-backs feed Tielemans, Onana and De Bruyne
Attack	De Bruyne service, wide isolation, Trossard movement, striker box presence
Defense	Counter-press after loss, Onana screening, centre-backs protecting Taremi route
Transitions	Quick release to Doku, Trossard, Lukebakio or De Bruyne after regain
Set Pieces	De Bruyne/Tielemans delivery to Lukaku, Onana, De Ketelaere and centre-backs
Weakness	Finishing rhythm, striker fitness, space behind full-backs and defensive recovery

Build-up Style

Belgium should control the first phase. Courtois can pass short or go long. The centre-backs should find Tielemans or Onana early. De Bruyne should receive higher, not too close to the centre-backs. If he drops too deep, Belgium may lose final-third creativity.

The key is tempo. Iran will likely defend compactly. Belgium cannot move the ball slowly from side to side without penetration. They need quick switches, early diagonal balls, and combinations around the box.

Useful Belgium build-up routes:

• centre-back to Tielemans to De Bruyne;
• De Bruyne diagonal to the far winger;
• De Cuyper overlap into crossing lane;
• Doku isolated one-vs-one;
• Trossard inside movement around the striker;
• Onana winning second balls after clearances;
• Lukaku or De Ketelaere pinning the centre-backs.

Pressing Line

Belgium can press Iran high, but they must not overcommit. Iran can go direct to Taremi or wide to Mohebi and Jahanbakhsh. Belgium’s press should trap Iran near the sideline and force low-quality clearances.

Useful Belgium pressing triggers:

• Beiranvand receives a back pass;
• Iran centre-back receives facing own goal;
• Ezatolahi receives under pressure;
• Iran full-back receives near the touchline;
• Taremi drops and takes a heavy touch;
• Iran clear without midfield support.

The counter-press after losing the ball may decide the match. If Belgium stop Iran’s first forward pass, they can keep pressure high. If Iran play through the first wave, Belgium can become exposed.

Main Attacking Side

Belgium’s main attacking side depends on Doku. If Doku starts, Belgium can target his flank repeatedly. If he does not start, Trossard and De Cuyper may become the main left-side creators, while Lukebakio or Saelemaekers can attack the right.

Belgium should not rely only on crosses. Iran’s centre-backs and Beiranvand can handle predictable balls. Better routes include cutbacks, De Bruyne through passes, Trossard combinations and second balls around the penalty arc.

Key Passer

De Bruyne is the main passer. Tielemans is the rhythm passer. Courtois can also be a major distribution weapon. Belgium’s best sequences will likely involve De Bruyne receiving between Iran’s midfield and defence.

Transition Threat

Belgium can transition quickly if Iran commit players forward. Those moments may be limited. More often, Belgium will attack after winning the ball back from an Iran clearance. That second-phase pressure can produce high-value shots.

Set-Piece Profile

Belgium have strong set-piece tools. De Bruyne and Tielemans can deliver. Lukaku, Onana, De Ketelaere, Theate, Mechele, Debast and De Winter can attack aerial balls. Iran must defend both the first ball and the second ball.

Defensive Weakness

Belgium’s main defensive weakness is space after full-back advances. If both full-backs go high and Onana steps forward, Taremi can receive into a large transition lane. Belgium must stagger their rest defence.

Goalkeeper Distribution

Courtois can help Belgium bypass Iran’s first pressure. He must also stay alert because Iran may create few chances but high-value chances. A goalkeeper can be quiet for 70 minutes and still decide the match.

Full-Back Behavior

Belgium’s full-backs can support attacks, but they must coordinate. One can advance. The opposite side should hold. Onana should remain close enough to stop counters.

Striker Role

The striker choice changes Belgium’s attack. Lukaku gives power, presence and gravity. De Ketelaere gives movement, link play and pressing flexibility. Trossard as a false nine would increase rotation but reduce classic penalty-box power.

Tactical Identity: IR Iran

Iran Tactical Table

Phase	Expected Pattern
Build-up	Low-risk exits, Beiranvand long distribution, Ezatolahi/Ghoddos support
Attack	Direct counters through Taremi, Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh and Rezaeian
Defense	Compact block, central protection and forced wide attacks
Transitions	First forward pass into Taremi or wide runner
Set Pieces	Rezaeian delivery, Taremi movement, centre-back aerial targets
Weakness	Defensive spacing after New Zealand draw, pressure under wide overloads, possession relief

Build-up Style

Iran should not overplay in central areas. Belgium can press with De Bruyne, Trossard, Onana and wide players. Beiranvand can go long when needed. Ezatolahi and Ghoddos must offer simple passing options when Iran need to rest with the ball.

The most important build-up task is clean first contact. If Taremi receives long balls without support, Iran will lose possession quickly. If Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh or Ghoddos get close, Iran can create real attacks.

Pressing Line

Iran should press selectively. A constant high press against Belgium may leave too much space. Ghalenoei may prefer a mid-block or low block with specific pressing triggers.

Useful Iran pressing triggers:

• Belgium centre-back receives facing own goal;
• Tielemans receives with pressure from behind;
• De Bruyne drops too deep and has limited forward options;
• Belgium full-back receives near the sideline;
• Courtois delays distribution;
• Belgium reset after a failed cross.

Iran must avoid fouls around the box. Belgium have elite delivery and aerial targets.

Main Attacking Side

Iran’s right side can be important because Rezaeian provides experience, delivery and forward support. Jahanbakhsh can operate as a wide leader. Mohebi can attack space on the opposite side. Taremi is the central reference.

The best Iran attacks will likely be short and direct:

• win the ball;
• find Ghoddos or Ezatolahi;
• release Taremi or a winger;
• support with one midfielder;
• force a shot, foul, corner or longer possession spell.

Key Passer

Ghoddos is an important connector. Ezatolahi provides structure. Rezaeian can deliver from wide and set pieces. Taremi can also act as a passer when he drops and lays the ball off.

Transition Threat

Transition is Iran’s best route. Belgium will likely control territory. That creates space behind Belgian full-backs. Taremi’s intelligence makes those spaces dangerous even if Iran have limited possession.

The ideal Iran transition:

• win the ball in midfield or the defensive third;
• play into Taremi within two touches;
• support him through Mohebi or Jahanbakhsh;
• attack before Belgium reset;
• create a shot, corner, foul or long throw.

Set-Piece Profile

Iran can use set pieces as a route to pressure. Rezaeian can deliver. Taremi can attack space. Centre-backs can provide aerial targets. Set pieces also slow Belgium’s rhythm and help Iran gain territory.

Defensive Weakness

Iran’s main weakness is defensive spacing if Belgium move the ball quickly. Against Belgium’s wide quality, full-backs can become isolated. The second weakness is defending second balls after Beiranvand saves or punches.

Goalkeeper Distribution

Beiranvand is central. He can use long distribution to bypass pressure. He must also manage crosses and rebounds. If Belgium shoot often, rebound control becomes crucial.

Full-Back Behavior

Iran’s full-backs should defend first. Rezaeian can support attacks, but he must choose moments carefully. If he advances too early, Belgium can attack the space behind him.

Striker Role

Taremi must do several jobs. He must hold the ball, draw fouls, attack the box and connect transitions. Iran need him to turn limited possession into meaningful attacks.

Tactical Collision Map

Zone	Belgium Edge	Iran Edge	Likely Control	Why It Matters
Belgium left / Iran right	Trossard, De Cuyper, Doku if used	Rezaeian experience and counter route	Belgium in possession, Iran in transition	Wide pressure and counter risk
Belgium right / Iran left	Doku/Lukebakio/Saelemaekers width	Mohammadi recovery and Mohebi counter	Belgium	One-vs-one duels can break block
Central midfield	De Bruyne, Tielemans, Onana	Ezatolahi, Ghoddos, compact screen	Belgium by possession	Controls rhythm and chance quality
Penalty box	Lukaku/De Ketelaere, Trossard, Onana	Beiranvand, Khalilzadeh, Taremi defensive set pieces	Belgium by volume	Belgium must convert territory
Set pieces	De Bruyne/Tielemans delivery	Rezaeian delivery, Taremi movement	Balanced	Dead balls can decide tight match
Transitions	Belgium counter-press	Taremi, Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh	Iran danger	Iran’s best route
Defensive third	Belgium likely defend fewer phases	Iran defend long spells	Iran under pressure	Tests concentration and fatigue

Key Duel 1: Kevin De Bruyne vs Saeid Ezatolahi

De Bruyne wants to receive between the lines. Ezatolahi must block central passes and prevent clean turns.

Why it matters: If De Bruyne faces forward, Belgium can create high-quality chances.

What to watch: Whether Iran track him with a midfielder or protect zones.

Risk trigger: If Ezatolahi gets booked early, Iran’s central defence becomes less aggressive.

Key Duel 2: Romelu Lukaku / Charles De Ketelaere vs Shojae Khalilzadeh

Belgium’s central striker must pin Iran’s centre-backs. Khalilzadeh must control first contact.

Why it matters: Belgium need a penalty-box reference against a compact block.

What to watch: Whether Belgium’s striker receives with support or becomes isolated.

Risk trigger: If Iran centre-backs lose aerial duels early, Belgium can build pressure.

Key Duel 3: Jeremy Doku / Belgium Wide Player vs Iran Full-Back

Belgium’s wide players can create one-vs-one pressure.

Why it matters: Iran’s block can survive central passing if Belgium cannot beat wide defenders.

What to watch: Whether Iran double-team the winger or allow isolation.

Risk trigger: If the full-back receives an early yellow card, Belgium may target that side repeatedly.

Key Duel 4: Mehdi Taremi vs Belgium Rest Defence

Taremi is Iran’s main outlet and scoring reference.

Why it matters: Belgium can dominate possession and still suffer if Taremi receives cleanly after turnovers.

What to watch: Whether Onana and the centre-backs stay connected after Belgium attacks.

Risk trigger: If Taremi draws fouls or holds up play, Iran can escape pressure and create set pieces.

Key Duel 5: Alireza Beiranvand vs Belgium Shot Volume

Beiranvand may face pressure if Belgium dominate territory.

Why it matters: Iran need their goalkeeper to keep the game close.

What to watch: Save technique, rebound control and cross handling.

Risk trigger: If rebounds fall centrally, Belgium’s second-wave runners can punish Iran.

Projected Match Statistics

Projected Stat	Belgium	IR Iran	Confidence	Reason
Possession	58–68%	32–42%	Medium/high	Belgium should control more ball and territory
Shots	13–23	5–11	Medium	Belgium have more creative volume; Iran have counter routes
Shots on Target	4–8	2–4	Medium	Beiranvand likely busier; Iran can still create efficient chances
xG Range	1.40–2.60	0.45–1.15	Medium	Belgium chance quality depends on central access and striker role
Big Chances	1–4	0–2	Low/medium	First goal and transition quality can shift the model
Corners	5–10	2–5	Medium	Belgium territory likely creates more corners
Fouls	9–14	11–18	Medium	Iran defensive workload and Belgium recovery fouls both relevant
Yellow Cards	1–3	1–4	Low/medium	Referee unknown; transitions and wide duels raise risk
Red-Card Risk	Low	Low/medium	Low	No red card is predicted
Offsides	1–3	1–4	Low	Belgium striker and Taremi can attack lines
Saves	2–4	4–7	Medium	Iran goalkeeper likely faces more volume
Crosses	16–30	7–15	Medium	Belgium likely use width against compact block
Tackles	12–20	18–30	Medium	Iran likely defend more one-vs-one actions
Interceptions	8–14	12–22	Medium	Iran’s compact block can cut central passes
Clearances	10–20	24–42	Medium/high	Iran may defend repeated Belgian entries

Statistical Storyline

Belgium should lead possession, shots and corners. That does not make the result certain. Belgium’s most important statistic is not possession. It is shot quality. If Belgium create central chances from De Bruyne passes, cutbacks and striker movement, the favourite model strengthens. If Belgium only create blocked crosses and long shots, Iran’s defensive model stays alive.

Iran’s route is lower-volume but dangerous. Taremi, Jahanbakhsh, Mohebi and Rezaeian can make a small number of attacks count.

90-Minute Probability Map

Match Window	Tactical State	Physical State	Card Risk	Goal Risk	Betting Market Trigger
1’–15’	Belgium likely control ball; Iran likely defend compactly	Mild conditions support early pressing	Low/medium	Medium	First De Bruyne touch, first Iran counter
16’–30’	Belgium may increase wide pressure	Iran defensive workload rises	Medium	Medium	Belgium corner count, Beiranvand saves
31’–45+’	If level, Iran belief grows; Belgium urgency rises	Physical load remains manageable	Medium/high	Medium	Late first-half set pieces
46’–60’	Garcia may adjust striker or wing profile	Fresh intensity after halftime	Medium	Medium/high	Lukaku usage, Doku/Trossard role
61’–75’	Space can open if Belgium push	Transition fatigue appears	High	Medium/high	Iran counter success, Belgium bench impact
76’–90+’	Game state dominates	Concentration matters more than heat	High	High	Draw protection, winner chase, live total shift

1’–15’

Belgium should try to take control without rushing. Iran need compact distances and one early counter or set piece to show Belgium that transition risk is real.

16’–30’

Belgium may begin to overload wide areas. Iran must avoid fouls near the box. Beiranvand’s command can calm the team if Belgium create early shots.

31’–45+

If the match remains level, pressure starts to build on Belgium. Iran can slow the match through restarts and set pieces.

46’–60’

This window may show Belgium’s striker plan. Lukaku’s role, whether starting or entering, can change the box dynamic. Iran may also add a runner if Belgium push too high.

61’–75’

Belgium may increase risk if still searching for a goal. Iran’s transition route can improve if the Belgian full-backs tire or push too high.

76’–90+

The final window depends on the score. A draw may be useful for Iran. Belgium may see a draw as missed control. Card risk, set-piece risk and emotional decisions rise.

Weather-to-Match Model

Factor	Expected Impact	Belgium Effect	Iran Effect
Mild temperature	Allows sustained pressing phases	Belgium can press higher if structure is right	Iran can counter with repeated sprints
Limited heat stress	Less need to reduce tempo early	More room for aggressive counter-pressing	Defensive block still needs energy
Exact humidity unavailable	Avoid precise cramp claims	Hydration remains standard	Travel recovery may matter more
Wind not fully verified	Crosses and diagonals need live calibration	De Bruyne switches and wide service need adjustment	Beiranvand long kicks need adjustment
No altitude	Normal oxygen recovery	Helps pressing waves	Helps transition sprints
Stadium canopy context	May moderate sun and wind	Passing rhythm can stay stable	Goalkeeper handling still needs live reading
Pitch speed unknown	First touches matter	Fast circulation requires calibration	Clearances and counters must adjust
Travel and preparation	Can affect freshness	Belgium likely more settled	Iran’s logistics can affect recovery

The most important match-context factor is preparation load rather than weather. Los Angeles conditions are manageable. Iran’s travel and recovery context may be more important than temperature. Belgium must use the favourable physical setting to press intelligently, not emotionally.

Player Impact Index

Player	Team	Role	Match Impact Score /10	Reason
Kevin De Bruyne	Belgium	Creator / midfielder	9.2	Main final-third passer and tempo changer
Thibaut Courtois	Belgium	Goalkeeper	8.7	Concentration against limited but dangerous chances
Romelu Lukaku	Belgium	Striker	8.6 if fit	Box presence and gravity against deep block
Leandro Trossard	Belgium	Forward / winger	8.4	Movement, finishing and combination play
Youri Tielemans	Belgium	Midfielder	8.2	Passing rhythm and set-piece delivery
Amadou Onana	Belgium	Midfielder	8.1	Counter-pressing and physical balance
Jeremy Doku	Belgium	Winger	8.0 if available	One-vs-one pressure and width
Charles De Ketelaere	Belgium	Attacker	7.9	Link play and alternative striker profile
Alireza Beiranvand	Iran	Goalkeeper	8.9	Likely high workload and distribution value
Mehdi Taremi	Iran	Forward	8.8	Main outlet, scorer and foul-drawing threat
Ramin Rezaeian	Iran	Full-back / wide outlet	8.3	Set-piece quality and right-side progression
Alireza Jahanbakhsh	Iran	Winger / leader	8.2	Experience, delivery and transition link
Saeid Ezatolahi	Iran	Midfielder	8.1	Defensive screen and aerial presence
Saman Ghoddos	Iran	Midfielder	8.0	Technical link between defence and attack
Mohammad Mohebi	Iran	Forward / winger	7.9	Direct running and transition support
Shojae Khalilzadeh	Iran	Centre-back	7.9	Box defence and physical duels

Most Important Attacker

De Bruyne is Belgium’s most important attacking player because he can turn possession into chances. Taremi is Iran’s most important attacker because he can turn limited possession into shots, fouls and set pieces.

Most Important Defender

Courtois matters because Belgium may face fewer shots but higher-pressure isolated moments. Beiranvand matters because Iran may defend long spells and need saves, crosses and long distribution.

Most Important Midfielder

Onana and Tielemans must support De Bruyne and protect against counters. Ezatolahi and Ghoddos must keep Iran compact and connect the first pass out.

Bench Player Who Can Change the Match

Lukaku can change the match if he starts on the bench. Doku can change the match if he is used as a fresh winger. For Iran, Ghayedi, Moghanlou, Mohebi or Jahanbakhsh-type attacking profiles can change the counter plan depending on the official XI.

Player at Card Risk

Iran full-backs and midfield screen carry card risk against Belgium’s wide players and De Bruyne. Belgium centre-backs and Onana carry card risk if Taremi and Mohebi break into space.

Player at Injury-Management Risk

Lukaku remains Belgium’s major minutes-management watchlist. No confirmed Iran match-day injury-management case was available from verified public data in this source set.

Referee, Cards and Discipline Preview

The referee and VAR were not available from verified official public data in this source set. This discipline section uses tactical logic only.

Discipline Factor	Forecast
Referee Style	Not available from verified official public data
Tactical Foul Risk	Medium
Dissent Risk	Medium because of group stakes
VAR Intervention Risk	Medium
Penalty Risk	Medium
Red-Card Risk	Low/medium

Cards Forecast Table

Team	Yellow-Card Range	Red-Card Risk	Main Risk Zone
Belgium	1–3	Low	Recovery fouls after Iran counters
Iran	1–4	Low/medium	Full-back zones and midfield fouls against De Bruyne, Doku and Trossard

Iran may face more defensive actions. Belgium may commit tactical fouls if Iran beat the counter-press. The unknown referee profile reduces confidence in card projections.

Set-Piece Intelligence

Set-Piece Area	Belgium	Iran	Edge
Corners For	Lukaku, Onana, De Ketelaere, centre-backs attack delivery	Beiranvand, Khalilzadeh, Ezatolahi and defenders clear	Belgium by volume
Corners Against	Courtois and centre-backs defend Taremi and aerial targets	Rezaeian delivery and Taremi movement	Balanced
Wide Free Kicks	De Bruyne, Tielemans, Trossard delivery options	Rezaeian and Jahanbakhsh delivery options	Belgium technical edge
Direct Free Kicks	De Bruyne/Tielemans profiles	Rezaeian/Jahanbakhsh profiles	Belgium slight edge
Penalties	Taker hierarchy should be confirmed from official XI	Taremi profile if on pitch; official hierarchy should be checked	Unknown
Long Throws	Not available from verified public data	Not available from verified public data	Unknown
Aerial Duels	Strong through Lukaku, Onana, De Ketelaere and defenders	Strong through Taremi, Ezatolahi, Khalilzadeh	Belgium by volume, Iran by resistance

Set pieces are important because Iran may defend deep. Belgium can create corners and free kicks through pressure. Iran can create their best chances from restarts if open-play possession is limited.

Goalkeeper and Defensive Risk Map

Area	Belgium	Iran
Goalkeeper Distribution	Courtois can build short or bypass pressure	Beiranvand can go direct toward Taremi
Shot-Stopping Pressure	Low/medium	Medium/high
Cross Handling	Medium against Iran set pieces	High against Belgium wide pressure
High-Line Risk	Medium if Belgium overcommit	Low if Iran defend deep
Penalty-Box Defending	Must track Taremi, Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh and set-piece runners	Must track Lukaku/De Ketelaere, Trossard, Onana and De Bruyne runners
Back-Post Weakness	Possible if Belgium over-shift toward Taremi	Possible against Belgium switches
Defensive Communication	Key after turnovers	Constant under Belgian pressure

Beiranvand may face more volume. Courtois may face fewer actions, but those actions can be decisive. The goalkeeper who controls crosses and rebounds better can change the match’s risk profile.

Bench and Substitution Forecast

Minute Window	Belgium Possible Change	Iran Possible Change	Trigger
45’–60’	Add Lukaku, Doku, Lukebakio or Trossard depending on starters	Add wide runner or extra midfielder	Scoreline and chance quality
60’–75’	Add direct striker or fresh winger	Add defensive legs if drawing; striker if trailing	Fatigue and tactical state
75’–90’	Chase winner with attacking overload or protect lead with Witsel/Onana structure	Protect draw/lead or chase through Taremi support	Group math and game state

If Belgium Lead

Belgium should control the ball and avoid transition mistakes. They should not drop too deep too early because Iran can attack set pieces and long balls.

If Iran Lead

Iran will likely defend deeper and use Taremi as an outlet. Belgium must avoid panic crossing and keep De Bruyne central.

If the Match Is Level After 70 Minutes

A draw may be more useful for Iran than Belgium. Belgium may chase the win. That can open counter space for Iran.

Betting Market Intelligence and Risk Review

| Market | Current Signal | Main Risk |
|—|—|
| Match Winner | Belgium listed as favourite | Iran transition route, Belgium finishing issues and Lukaku minutes management |
| Double Chance | Belgium or draw likely short | Limited value if price becomes too compressed |
| Over/Under Goals | Public market snapshot lists 2.5 goals | Iran’s compact block can suppress total; early goal can open match |
| BTTS | Plausible | Iran scored twice in opener but Belgium may control shot volume |
| Corners | Belgium corner volume likely higher | Early Belgium goal can reduce pressure volume |
| Cards | Medium | Iran defensive workload and Belgium recovery fouls |
| Player Shots | De Bruyne, Trossard, Lukaku/De Ketelaere, Taremi, Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh watchlist | Official lineups and roles matter |
| Player Cards | Iran full-backs, Ezatolahi, Belgium recovery defenders | Referee threshold unknown |

What Could Move Odds Before Kick-off

Trigger	Possible Market Effect
Lukaku starting status	Changes Belgium scorer and shot markets
Doku availability	Changes Belgium width and dribble market
Belgium striker choice	De Ketelaere vs Lukaku changes attacking model
Iran back-five signal	Can lower totals and raise Belgium corners
Taremi starting status	Supports Iran shot and BTTS markets
Referee announcement	Can move cards and penalty markets
Weather / pitch update	Can affect tempo and passing speed
Public money on Belgium	Can shorten favourite price and reduce value

Live Betting Trigger Table

Trigger	Meaning	Risk
De Bruyne receives freely	Belgium chance creation improves	Iran may still protect box
Belgium only create blocked crosses	Iran low-block model works	Corner count can rise without goals
Beiranvand makes early saves	Iran confidence rises	Save volume can also signal danger
Taremi holds up counters	Iran upset route becomes live	One counter can overstate balance
0-0 after 60’	Belgium pressure rises; Iran draw value rises	Belgium bench can still change match
Iran full-back booked	Belgium wide attack value rises	Referee threshold may shift

This preview explains match data and market behavior. It does not provide guaranteed betting advice. World Cup betting involves risk. Readers should check local gambling laws, use licensed operators, set limits and avoid chasing losses.

Forecast Failure Factors

Factor	How It Can Break the Forecast
Late Lineup Change	Lukaku, Doku or Iran back-line decisions can change the model
Early Goal	Forces one team away from base plan
Early Yellow Card	Changes full-back or midfield aggression
Injury	Can remove a creator, striker or defensive screen
VAR Penalty	Creates a non-pattern goal
Weather Shift	Pitch speed or wind can change passing and crossing
Red Card	Makes possession and xG projections much less useful
Goalkeeper Error	Can swing a favourite-underdog match
Tactical Surprise	Iran may press higher or Belgium may use a false-nine model
Market Overreaction	Belgium possession can shorten prices without clear chances

The forecast can fail if Iran score first and force Belgium into impatient attacks. It can also fail if Belgium score early and Iran must open up. Referee decisions, goalkeeper saves, finishing, set pieces and transition defending can all break the pre-match model.

Scoreline Scenarios

Scenario	Probability Band	Match Story
Belgium Narrow Win	Medium/high	Belgium control possession, create enough chances and convert one key moment
Draw	Medium	Iran defend compactly, Beiranvand performs well and Belgium lack cutting edge
Iran Upset	Low/medium	Iran score from transition or set piece and survive pressure
High-Scoring Match	Medium	Early goal opens the match and creates transition space
Low-Scoring Match	Medium/high	Iran’s block suppresses chance quality and Belgium struggle to finish

The safest scenario frame is Belgium-favoured but not Belgium-certain. Belgium have stronger individual quality and more creative tools. Iran have a disciplined block, an elite outlet in Taremi and enough set-piece quality to make the match uncomfortable.

Group Scenario Matrix

Result	Belgium Impact	Iran Impact
Belgium Win	Belgium move to four points and gain control before New Zealand	Iran stay on one point and need a strong final match against Egypt
Draw	Belgium move to two points and stay alive but under pressure	Iran move to two points and keep a realistic route
Iran Win	Belgium stay on one point and face major pressure before New Zealand	Iran move to four points and take a major step toward qualification

Four points would be valuable. Two points would keep either team alive but uncomfortable. One point after two matches would be dangerous. The third-place route matters, but no team should rely on it.

What Each Team Must Do to Win

Belgium Win Conditions

• Belgium must move the ball faster than they did in the opener.
• Belgium must get De Bruyne facing forward between lines.
• Belgium must decide the striker role clearly.
• Belgium must support Lukaku or De Ketelaere with runners.
• Belgium must use width without becoming predictable.
• Belgium must attack rebounds after Beiranvand saves.
• Belgium must protect against Taremi-led counters.
• Belgium must avoid cheap fouls near Rezaeian and Jahanbakhsh delivery zones.
• Belgium must stay calm if Iran keep the score level.
• Belgium must use the bench before the attack becomes static.

IR Iran Win Conditions

• Iran must keep the first 20 minutes compact.
• Iran must deny De Bruyne central receiving lanes.
• Iran must protect Beiranvand from close-range rebounds.
• Iran must force Belgium wide and away from central shots.
• Iran must support Taremi after direct passes.
• Iran must use Mohebi, Jahanbakhsh and Rezaeian as real outlets.
• Iran must avoid early yellow cards in full-back zones.
• Iran must make set pieces high-value events.
• Iran must manage travel and recovery stress.
• Iran must stay composed if Belgium dominate possession.

Source and Data Appendix

Data Point	Status	Source Type
Match Date	Confirmed	FIFA match centre / ticketing listing
Kick-off Time	Confirmed	FIFA UTC listing and local ticketing listing
Stadium	Confirmed	FIFA match centre / venue listing
City	Confirmed	FIFA / venue context
Group	Confirmed	FIFA / Reuters Group G context
Belgium Opener Result	Confirmed	Reuters / match reporting
Iran Opener Result	Confirmed	Reuters / match reporting
Belgium Coach	Confirmed	Reuters / FIFA squad context
Iran Coach	Confirmed	Reuters / FIFA squad context
Belgium Squad	Confirmed	Reuters / FIFA squad source
Iran Squad	Confirmed	Reuters / FIFA squad source
Lukaku Fitness Context	Reported / watchlist	Reuters pre-tournament and opener reporting
Azmoun Absence	Confirmed not selected	Reuters squad reporting
Referee	Pending	Not available from verified official public data
VAR	Pending	Not available from verified official public data
Weather	Forecast / historical matchday profile	Weather service
Lineups	Projected	Editorial forecast until official team sheet
Injuries	Partly reported / partly unavailable	Public reporting and unknowns marked
Odds	Market-signal only	Public sportsbook / broadcaster market snapshot
Projected Stats	Model-based	Editorial projection using opener context and tactical matchup
Minute-Window Scenarios	Scenario-based	Editorial model, not factual prediction

This dossier uses confirmed information where available and marks unknown data clearly. It does not invent official starting XIs, expected attendance, referee assignment, VAR assignment, exact pitch speed, exact humidity, exact wind or unverified suspensions.

Disclaimer: Forecast Accuracy and Betting Risk

This preview is analytical and informational. The forecast is not a guarantee. Football includes randomness and low-probability events. Final lineups, injuries, referee decisions, VAR, weather and early goals can change the match.

Projected statistics, scoreline scenarios and betting market notes are probability-based estimates. Belgium can dominate possession and still fail to win. Iran can create fewer chances and still score from a counter, set piece or individual action. A goalkeeper error, red card, deflection, penalty, injury or weather shift can break the pre-match model.

Betting markets move before and during the match. Readers should verify official lineups, injuries, referee information, weather conditions, pitch condition and market prices before making decisions. Readers should check local gambling laws. Readers should use licensed operators only. Readers should set spending and time limits. Readers should not chase losses. Betting should be treated as entertainment, not income.

This article does not provide guaranteed betting advice, fixed-match information, insider tips, prediction tools, risk-free picks or certain outcomes.

FAQ

[expert_review params=»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»]