Panama vs Croatia World Cup 2026 Preview
Table of Contents Show
Panama face Croatia in a FIFA World Cup 2026 Group L match at Toronto Stadium in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The match is scheduled for Tuesday, 23 June 2026, with kick-off listed at 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time and 23:00 UTC. This is Match 46 in the group stage.
Both teams enter under pressure after opening defeats. Panama lost 1-0 to Ghana after conceding late. Croatia lost 4-2 to England after a match that exposed defensive and set-piece problems. Panama are coached by Thomas Christiansen. Croatia are coached by Zlatko Dalić. Panama will be without key midfielder Adalberto Carrasquilla, who has been recovering from a muscle injury and felt unwell in training. Croatia have no major projected-XI injury absence from the public lineup context used here.
The likely tactical shape is Panama using a compact 3-4-3, with Orlando Mosquera in goal, José Córdoba anchoring the back line, and Yoel Bárcenas, José Luis Rodríguez and Cecilio Waterman carrying the counterattack. Croatia are expected to use a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, with Luka Modrić, Mateo Kovačić and Petar Sučić controlling midfield and Petar Musa leading the line. The key matchup is Croatia’s midfield control against Panama’s transition speed. Croatia are market favourites, but this preview is analytical only and does not provide guaranteed betting advice.
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Match | Panama vs Croatia |
| Competition | FIFA World Cup 2026 |
| Stage | First Stage / Group Stage |
| Group | Group L |
| Match Number | Match 46 |
| Date | Tuesday, 23 June 2026 |
| Kick-off Time | 7:00 p.m. ET / 23:00 UTC |
| Stadium | Toronto Stadium |
| Common Venue Context | BMO Field context |
| City | Toronto, Ontario |
| Host Country | Canada |
| Expected Attendance | Not available from verified public data |
| Referee | Not available from verified public data |
| VAR | Not available from verified public data |
| Weather Forecast | Mild Toronto evening profile; around 69°F / 21°C near 8:00 p.m.; mostly clear to partly cloudy; exact match-hour wind and pitch watering not available from verified public data |
| Pitch Context | Open-air stadium; exact pitch speed, grass moisture and watering schedule not available from verified public data |
| Main Article Focus | Group L survival pressure, Panama without Carrasquilla, Croatia’s defensive correction, Modrić’s 200th-cap context, projected lineups, tactical collision map, weather, cards, set pieces and responsible betting analysis |
Panama vs Croatia is a direct survival match. England and Ghana won their opening games. Panama and Croatia lost. That makes this match decisive in practical terms. The winner can restore a Round of 32 route. The loser may face elimination pressure before the final group match, especially if England or Ghana avoid defeat elsewhere.
Panama vs Croatia matters because both teams started Group L with zero points, and another defeat could leave either side close to early elimination before the final group match.
| Category | Status | Panama vs Croatia Example | Article Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmed fact | Verified before publication | Panama vs Croatia, Group L, Match 46, Toronto Stadium | |
| Confirmed timing | Verified fixture context | 23 June 2026, 7:00 p.m. ET / 23:00 UTC | |
| Confirmed Panama opener | Verified reporting | Panama lost 1-0 to Ghana | |
| Confirmed Croatia opener | Verified reporting | Croatia lost 4-2 to England | |
| Confirmed Panama team news | Verified reporting | Adalberto Carrasquilla will miss the Croatia match | |
| Confirmed Croatia coach comment | Verified reporting | Dalić wants Croatia to act like favourites and repair defensive errors | |
| Confirmed group context | Verified reporting | England and Ghana opened with three points; Panama and Croatia opened with zero | |
| Announced / reported information | Pre-match reporting | Modrić is in 200th-cap focus; Panama believe they can surprise Croatia | |
| Probable information | Tactical forecast | Croatia likely control more possession; Panama likely defend compactly and counter | |
| Projected data | Model-based estimate | Possession, shots, xG, corners, cards, substitutions and scoreline scenarios | |
| Unknown data | Not available from verified public data | Expected attendance, referee, VAR, exact pitch speed, exact wind | |
| Scenario-based analysis | Forecast only | Panama may protect a draw late; Croatia may push harder if the match stays level |
This distinction matters because the match can be misread through reputation alone. Croatia have World Cup pedigree. They reached the 2018 final and finished third in 2022. That history does not win this match by itself. Panama lost late against Ghana, but that does not mean they were passive or hopeless. Carrasquilla’s absence is confirmed, but Panama’s replacement structure remains a projection until the official lineup is released.
A projected xG range is not a final statistic. A predicted lineup is not an official team sheet. A market price is not a guarantee. A weather forecast is not final pitch condition. This dossier separates confirmed information from forecast work so the reader can see where the analysis is strong and where uncertainty remains.
Group L opened with England and Ghana taking control. England beat Croatia 4-2. Ghana beat Panama 1-0. Croatia and Panama therefore entered this match without points.
| Team | Played | Won | Drawn | Lost | Goals For | Goals Against | Goal Difference | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 |
| Ghana | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| Panama | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| Croatia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
This table should be updated if England vs Ghana has finished before publication. The core pressure remains clear. Panama and Croatia need points. A defeat could be damaging enough to make the final match a survival exercise with limited control over qualification.
Panama’s opener against Ghana ended painfully. They lost 1-0 after conceding very late. That result took away a point that would have changed the group picture. Christiansen’s team looked competitive and created enough moments to believe they could trouble stronger sides, but they did not convert their play into a result.
The Carrasquilla absence is a major issue. Panama lose a midfielder who can connect pressure, passing and control. Without him, Panama may need more direct transitions, more work from Carlos Harvey and Cristian Martínez, and cleaner wide output from Amir Murillo, Andrés Andrade, Yoel Bárcenas and José Luis Rodríguez.
Panama’s objectives:
Croatia entered the tournament with experience and high expectations. The 4-2 loss to England created immediate pressure. Dalić focused on defensive errors and set-piece execution. He also called on the team to act like favourites against Panama. That phrasing matters. Croatia cannot simply feel like the better side. They must show it through tempo, concentration and defensive control.
Croatia’s biggest risk is imbalance. They need to win, but they cannot attack recklessly. Panama’s forwards can run into open space. England exposed Croatia’s defensive problems, especially when the back line became stretched. If Croatia push both full-backs too high and lose the ball, Panama can turn one pass into a dangerous counter.
Croatia’s objectives:
Goal difference is already relevant. Panama are -1. Croatia are -2. A win can reset the qualification route. A draw keeps both alive but weak. A heavy defeat can damage the third-place route.
Croatia are especially aware of margin because they already conceded four against England. Panama are aware that a narrow defeat to Ghana was painful but not destructive. Another narrow loss may still leave mathematical hope, but practical control would be gone.
The expanded World Cup sends the top two teams in each group to the Round of 32. The best eight third-placed teams also qualify. This gives both Panama and Croatia a fallback path, but it does not remove pressure.
Three points after two matches would revive either team. One point would keep a team alive but exposed. Zero points after two matches would create severe danger. The third-place route usually requires points and a manageable goal difference. That makes both result and margin important.
The exact knockout path depends on group placement and third-place rankings. The practical issue is direct. Croatia want to move back into the top-two fight before facing Ghana. Panama want to avoid entering the England match with no points. The loser may need a final-round win and help elsewhere.
Panama carry opportunity pressure. They want a first World Cup win and believe they can surprise a more established opponent. Croatia carry expectation pressure. They have senior leaders, tournament history and a coach who expects a response. If Panama keep the match level deep into the second half, pressure may move sharply onto Croatia. If Croatia score early, Panama must avoid chasing in a way that opens space.
| Result | Panama Impact | Croatia Impact | Group L Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panama win | Panama move to three points and keep a historic qualification route alive before England | Croatia stay on zero points and face severe pressure before Ghana | Panama create a major upset and reset the group |
| Draw | Panama move to one point and remain alive but exposed | Croatia move to one point and remain alive but under pressure | Both teams lose control of qualification |
| Croatia win | Panama stay on zero points and likely need a major final-round result | Croatia move to three points and revive top-two or third-place route | Croatia restore their campaign |
| Factor | Match Relevance |
|---|---|
| Host country | Canada |
| Venue region | Ontario |
| City | Toronto |
| Stadium | Toronto Stadium |
| Common venue context | BMO Field |
| Neutral match | Neither team is host nation |
| Climate | Mild summer evening |
| Altitude | No meaningful altitude issue |
| Crowd profile | Croatian support, Panamanian support, Canadian neutrals and diaspora communities |
| Tournament pressure | Second group match with survival implications |
Toronto offers a more manageable physical environment than hot summer venues in the southern United States. The evening conditions should allow both teams to press, recover and sprint in repeated phases. That helps Croatia’s midfield control and Panama’s transition model.
| City Factor | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|
| 7:00 p.m. local kick-off | Evening match rhythm supports tempo |
| Around 69°F / 21°C near the later window | Mild temperature supports pressing and recovery |
| Mostly clear / partly cloudy profile | Low weather disruption risk |
| Open-air stadium | Wind and surface conditions still matter |
| No altitude issue | Normal oxygen recovery |
| Croatian fan presence expected | Croatia may gain emotional support |
| Panama underdog role | Counterattacks can energise neutral crowd |
| Urban venue context | Crowd noise can affect defensive communication |
Croatia may benefit from support in Toronto. Dalić mentioned the importance of the crowd as a “12th player” in pre-match context. Panama may use the underdog role to turn the atmosphere if they defend well and counter quickly.
| Stadium Detail | Data |
|---|---|
| FIFA Stadium Name | Toronto Stadium |
| Common Venue Context | BMO Field |
| City | Toronto |
| Province | Ontario |
| Host Country | Canada |
| Kick-off | 7:00 p.m. ET / 23:00 UTC |
| Expected Attendance | Not available from verified public data |
| Referee | Not available from verified public data |
| VAR | Not available from verified public data |
| Roof Status | Open-air stadium |
| Pitch Speed | Not available from verified public data |
| Tactical Impact | Open-air conditions can affect crosses, long balls and goalkeeper handling |
Toronto Stadium should support a football-specific rhythm. The exact pitch speed is not available from verified public data. The first 10 minutes should show whether the ball runs quickly and whether Croatia can circulate with clean tempo. Panama’s long releases will also depend on bounce and surface speed.
| Weather / Environment Factor | Tactical Meaning |
|---|---|
| Mild evening temperature | Pressing and repeated sprints are viable |
| Mostly clear to partly cloudy | Low disruption risk |
| Open-air stadium | Wind remains relevant for crosses and diagonals |
| Exact wind unavailable | Long passes need live calibration |
| Exact humidity unavailable | Avoid precise cramp claims |
| No altitude | Physical limits come from tempo, not elevation |
| No heavy rain forecast in source set | Goalkeeper handling risk is normal |
| Cooling late phase | Substitutes can maintain intensity |
The most important weather factor is open-air pass quality. Croatia will likely use switches, crosses and set pieces. Panama will likely use long transition passes. Wind and pitch speed can affect both. Heat should not be the central factor.
| Team | Player / Role | Status | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panama | Thomas Christiansen | Head coach | Must adjust without Carrasquilla |
| Panama | Adalberto Carrasquilla | Unavailable for this match | Removes key midfield connector and ball-progressor |
| Panama | Orlando Mosquera | Predicted goalkeeper | Shot-stopping and long distribution |
| Panama | José Córdoba | Predicted centre-back | Main defensive organiser and first-contact player |
| Panama | César Blackman | Predicted defender / wide defender | Defensive cover and wide ball progression |
| Panama | Jiovany Ramos | Predicted defender | Box defence and aerial support |
| Panama | Amir Murillo | Predicted wing-back / wide midfielder | Running power and right-side transitions |
| Panama | Carlos Harvey | Predicted midfielder | Physical duels and ball-winning |
| Panama | Cristian Martínez | Predicted midfielder | Passing support and defensive work |
| Panama | Yoel Bárcenas | Predicted wide forward | Pace, counters and set-piece support |
| Panama | Cecilio Waterman | Predicted striker | Central outlet and box reference |
| Panama | José Luis Rodríguez | Predicted wide forward | Counterattacking speed |
| Croatia | Zlatko Dalić | Head coach | Wants defensive repair and favourite behaviour |
| Croatia | Luka Modrić | Midfielder / captain | 200th-cap focus and main tempo controller |
| Croatia | Mateo Kovačić | Midfielder | Ball carrying and pressure escape |
| Croatia | Petar Sučić | Midfielder | Running support and second balls |
| Croatia | Dominik Livaković | Predicted goalkeeper | Shot-stopping and distribution |
| Croatia | Joško Gvardiol | Defender / left-back | Defensive quality and left-side progression |
| Croatia | Josip Stanišić | Defender | Right-side balance and recovery |
| Croatia | Josip Šutalo | Centre-back | Box defending and buildup |
| Croatia | Ivan Perišić | Forward / winger | Experience, crossing and left-side chance creation |
| Croatia | Martin Baturina | Attacker | Between-line movement and creative support |
| Croatia | Petar Musa | Striker | Central box threat after scoring against England |
| Player | Team | Status | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalberto Carrasquilla | Panama | Confirmed out by pre-match reporting after recovery setback / illness in training | Panama lose midfield control, passing and experience |
| Not available from verified public data | Panama | No other confirmed match-day doubtful player used in this preview | Official team sheet should be checked |
| Not available from verified public data | Croatia | No key injury listed in projected XI context | Official team sheet should be checked |
| Player | Team | Status | Tactical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adalberto Carrasquilla | Panama | Out for Croatia match | Removes a central midfielder who can connect defence to attack |
| Not available from verified public data | Croatia | No confirmed match-specific unavailable player used here | Do not invent absences |
| Player / Group | Team | Issue | Match Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrasquilla replacement zone | Panama | Tactical absence, not only injury issue | Harvey and Martínez may carry more midfield load |
| Waterman | Panama | Heavy hold-up workload, not confirmed injury | Must fight centre-backs and support counters |
| Panama wing-backs | Panama | High running demand | Must defend Croatia width and counter quickly |
| Modrić | Croatia | Workload watchlist due age and role, not injury | Croatia need him to manage tempo without overexposure |
| Croatia centre-backs | Croatia | Defensive correction watchlist after England | Must handle counterattacks better |
| Gvardiol / Stanišić | Croatia | Full-back recovery workload | Must attack and still protect transition lanes |
| Team | Confirmed Suspension | Notes |
|—|—|
| Panama | Not available from verified public data | No confirmed active suspension used in this preview |
| Croatia | Not available from verified public data | No confirmed active suspension used in this preview |
Carrasquilla’s absence is the central Panama issue. Panama can still compete, but they lose a midfielder who can slow the match, play through pressure and connect attacks. That pushes Panama toward a more direct model. Harvey and Martínez may need to win duels, protect the back line and move the ball quickly into wide outlets.
Croatia’s news is less about injuries and more about response. Dalić criticised defensive mistakes and set-piece execution after England. That likely pushes Croatia toward more conservative rest defence, cleaner set-piece organisation and a stronger focus on concentration. Croatia can dominate possession, but they cannot ignore Panama’s counters.
Official lineups were not available from verified public data at the time of writing. These XIs are projections based on public lineup previews, opener context and tactical logic.
| Position / Line | Player | Likely Role |
|---|---|---|
| GK | Orlando Mosquera | Goalkeeper, shot-stopping and long distribution |
| RCB | César Blackman | Right-side defender and recovery cover |
| CB | José Córdoba | Main centre-back and defensive organiser |
| LCB | Jiovany Ramos | Left centre-back and aerial defender |
| RWB | Amir Murillo | Right wing-back, running power and counter support |
| CM | Carlos Harvey | Ball-winning, defensive screen and second balls |
| CM | Cristian Martínez | Passing support and compactness |
| LWB | Andrés Andrade | Left-side defending and progressive support |
| RW | Yoel Bárcenas | Wide counter outlet and delivery |
| ST | Cecilio Waterman | Central striker, hold-up player and box target |
| LW | José Luis Rodríguez | Speed outlet and transition runner |
| Position / Line | Player | Likely Role |
|---|---|---|
| GK | Dominik Livaković | Goalkeeper, distribution and shot-stopping |
| RB | Josip Stanišić | Right-side balance and recovery defending |
| CB | Josip Šutalo | Centre-back, box defence and buildup |
| CB | Duje Ćaleta-Car / Luka Vušković | Aerial defender and first-contact role |
| LB | Joško Gvardiol | Left-side progression, defensive control and overlap support |
| CM | Mateo Kovačić | Ball carrying and pressure escape |
| CM | Luka Modrić | Tempo control, passing and leadership |
| CM | Petar Sučić | Running support, second balls and box arrivals |
| RW | Martin Baturina / Andrej Kramarić | Creative support and right-side movement |
| ST | Petar Musa | Central striker and penalty-box reference |
| LW | Ivan Perišić | Crossing, experience and wide threat |
| Team | Base Formation | In Possession | Out of Possession | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panama | 3-4-3 / 5-4-1 | Direct 3-2-5 in selected counters, with wing-backs supporting quickly | 5-4-1 low-to-mid block, Waterman as outlet | Medium/high |
| Croatia | 4-3-3 / 4-2-3-1 | 2-3-5 with Modrić/Kovačić control, Gvardiol high and Musa central | 4-1-4-1 or 4-3-3 counter-press | Medium |
| Scenario | Trigger | Expected Change |
|---|---|---|
| Panama protect central midfield | Carrasquilla absence leaves control gap | Harvey and Martínez sit deeper |
| Panama chase late goal | Trailing after 70 minutes | More direct forwards or wider service toward Waterman |
| Panama protect draw | Level late | Wing-backs drop and tempo slows |
| Panama target transition | Croatia full-backs push high | Rodríguez and Bárcenas stay higher |
| Croatia use 4-2-3-1 | Dalić wants more attacking support | Kramarić or Baturina plays closer to Musa |
| Croatia use three midfielders | Dalić wants control and balance | Modrić, Kovačić and Sučić manage tempo |
| Croatia protect lead | Leading after 70 minutes | Midfield control and reduced full-back risk |
| Croatia chase goal | Level late | Additional striker or more aggressive wide rotations |
| Phase | Expected Pattern |
|---|---|
| Build-up | Mosquera direct distribution, back three safe passes, Harvey/Martínez second-ball support |
| Attack | Waterman as target, Rodríguez and Bárcenas running wide channels |
| Defense | Compact back five, narrow midfield screen and forced Croatia wide attacks |
| Transitions | First forward pass into Waterman, Rodríguez or Bárcenas |
| Set Pieces | Córdoba, Ramos, Waterman and Murillo attack deliveries |
| Weakness | Carrasquilla absence, long defensive spells, late concentration and central progression |
Panama should not overplay in their own third. Croatia can control the ball and then counter-press after losses. Without Carrasquilla, Panama lose an important midfield connector. That means their build-up should be practical. Mosquera can go long. Córdoba can pass safely. Harvey and Martínez can collect second balls.
Useful Panama build-up routes:
Panama need enough possession breaks to rest the defensive block. If every clearance comes straight back, Croatia will create repeated pressure.
Panama are unlikely to press high for long periods. They can press selectively when Croatia pass backwards or isolate a centre-back. The main structure should remain compact.
Useful Panama pressing triggers:
Panama must avoid pressing in disconnected waves. If the front line jumps without midfield support, Croatia will play through.
Panama’s main attacking route may be the wide channels. Rodríguez can run behind. Bárcenas can carry and cross. Murillo can support from the right. Waterman must occupy centre-backs.
The best Panama attack is likely short and direct:
Without Carrasquilla, Panama’s key pass may come from Martínez, Harvey or a centre-back. The most important action is not a complex through ball. It is the first clean forward pass after recovery.
Transition is Panama’s clearest route. Croatia need to attack. That creates space behind full-backs and midfield. Panama must exploit those spaces quickly.
The ideal Panama transition:
Set pieces can help Panama. Córdoba, Ramos, Waterman and Murillo offer aerial targets. Croatia’s set-piece defence was criticised after England. Panama should test that area without overcommitting too many players forward.
Panama’s main weakness is central progression without Carrasquilla. The second weakness is late defensive concentration. They lost late to Ghana. Against Croatia, they must avoid another late lapse. Long defensive spells can create fatigue and clearances under pressure.
Mosquera must make clean decisions. Long distribution can relieve pressure. Short distribution should only be used when the passing lane is safe. Shot-stopping and rebound control may matter because Croatia are projected to create more volume.
Murillo and Andrade must defend first. They can attack when Panama win the ball cleanly. If both wing-backs push at the wrong time, Croatia can attack the back three.
Waterman must hold the ball, draw fouls, attack crosses and give Panama a physical reference. He may not receive many chances, so his hold-up work is important.
| Phase | Expected Pattern |
|---|---|
| Build-up | Livaković, centre-backs and Modrić/Kovačić control first and second phase |
| Attack | Modrić tempo, Kovačić carries, Perišić crosses, Musa central presence |
| Defense | Counter-press after loss, improved rest defence and better set-piece concentration |
| Transitions | Quick release through Kovačić, Baturina, Perišić or Musa |
| Set Pieces | Modrić/Perišić delivery, Gvardiol, Šutalo, Musa and centre-backs attack |
| Weakness | Defensive errors after England, full-back space and pressure if score remains level |
Croatia should have more of the ball. Modrić and Kovačić can dictate rhythm. Sučić can add running and second-ball support. Gvardiol can step forward from the left. Perišić can deliver from wide areas. Musa gives Croatia a penalty-box reference.
The key is speed. Croatia can be too slow if they recycle without penetration. Panama’s block can survive if Croatia take too many touches. Croatia need switches, third-man runs and early crosses when the box is occupied.
Useful Croatia build-up routes:
Croatia should press Panama’s first pass, but not recklessly. Panama want to release forwards into space. Croatia must stop the first forward ball without leaving the back line exposed.
Useful Croatia pressing triggers:
Croatia’s counter-press must be sharper than against England. If Panama beat it, Croatia can face open-field defending.
Croatia’s left side is a major route. Gvardiol and Perišić can combine. That side can create crosses, cutbacks and second balls. The right side depends on Baturina, Kramarić or another selected attacker. Modrić can direct both sides.
Modrić is the key passer and tempo-setter. Kovačić is the key carrier. Perišić is the key wide delivery player. Croatia’s best sequences may come when Modrić moves Panama’s block and then finds the far side quickly.
Croatia can transition if Panama push wing-backs forward. However, Croatia’s bigger need is transition defence. They must manage their own losses better than they did against England.
The ideal Croatia transition:
Croatia must improve set-piece execution. Dalić criticised the set-piece performance after England. Croatia still have targets and delivery. Gvardiol, Šutalo, Musa and other tall players can attack dead balls. Panama’s block may make set pieces important.
Croatia’s main weakness is rest defence. If full-backs push and midfielders join attacks, Panama can counter. The second weakness is pressure. If the match stays level, Croatia may rush attacks and make the game more chaotic.
Livaković should support controlled buildup. He may face fewer shots than Mosquera, but Panama’s shots can be high-value counters. His positioning and handling on set pieces matter.
Gvardiol can attack, but Croatia must stagger their full-backs. Stanišić may need to hold more often if Gvardiol goes high. The defensive balance behind Modrić and Kovačić is crucial.
Musa must occupy Panama’s centre-backs. He should attack crosses and rebounds. He also needs support from Baturina, Perišić, Kramarić or Sučić. If Musa becomes isolated, Croatia’s possession can become sterile.
| Zone | Panama Edge | Croatia Edge | Likely Control | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panama left / Croatia right | Rodríguez speed if Panama counter | Stanišić and right-side control | Balanced | Panama can target this lane in transition |
| Panama right / Croatia left | Murillo and Bárcenas counter route | Gvardiol and Perišić progression | Croatia in possession, Panama in transition | This may decide territory |
| Central midfield | Harvey / Martínez physical duels | Modrić, Kovačić, Sučić control | Croatia | Croatia must replace reputation with tempo |
| Penalty box | Waterman and Córdoba on set pieces | Musa, Gvardiol, Šutalo, Perišić delivery | Croatia by volume | Croatia need chance quality |
| Set pieces | Panama can test Croatia’s weakness | Croatia have stronger delivery depth | Balanced | Dalić highlighted this area after England |
| Transitions | Rodríguez, Bárcenas, Waterman | Croatia counter-press if organised | Panama danger | Panama’s main upset route |
| Defensive third | Panama likely defend long spells | Croatia must defend counters | Panama under pressure | Tests concentration and clearances |
Modrić will try to control tempo. Harvey and Martínez must close passing lanes without Carrasquilla’s help.
Why it matters: If Modrić dictates rhythm, Croatia can keep Panama trapped.
What to watch: Whether Panama can pressure Modrić’s first touch or must defend deeper.
Risk trigger: If Panama’s midfielders are booked early, Croatia’s central control becomes safer.
Rodríguez gives Panama pace. Gvardiol gives Croatia defensive and attacking quality.
Why it matters: Croatia need Gvardiol’s progression, but Panama can attack the space behind him.
What to watch: Gvardiol’s starting position after Croatia attacks.
Risk trigger: If Rodríguez gets one clean run early, Croatia may reduce full-back aggression.
Waterman is Panama’s central outlet.
Why it matters: Panama need him to hold the ball, win fouls and connect counters.
What to watch: Whether Waterman receives support from Bárcenas and Rodríguez.
Risk trigger: If Croatia centre-backs lose first-contact duels, Panama can create territory.
Perišić can deliver crosses. Murillo must defend and counter.
Why it matters: Croatia’s left-side attack can create volume, but Murillo can exploit the space behind.
What to watch: Whether Murillo is pinned deep or released into transition.
Risk trigger: If Murillo receives an early yellow, Croatia may target his side.
Musa gives Croatia a box target. Córdoba is Panama’s key defensive organiser.
Why it matters: Croatia need central threat, not only possession.
What to watch: Musa’s movement across Córdoba and the quality of Perišić’s service.
Risk trigger: If Córdoba has to defend repeated crosses, rebound risk rises.
| Projected Stat | Panama | Croatia | Confidence | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 32–42% | 58–68% | High | Croatia likely dominate the ball through Modrić and Kovačić |
| Shots | 5–11 | 12–22 | Medium/high | Croatia should create more volume; Panama counters can still matter |
| Shots on Target | 2–4 | 4–8 | Medium | Croatia should test Mosquera more often |
| xG Range | 0.45–1.10 | 1.25–2.35 | Medium | Croatia edge depends on chance quality, not only possession |
| Big Chances | 0–2 | 1–4 | Low/medium | Panama counters and Croatia set pieces create volatility |
| Corners | 2–5 | 5–10 | Medium | Croatia territory likely creates more corners |
| Fouls | 10–16 | 8–14 | Medium | Panama defensive workload and Croatia counter-stopping both relevant |
| Yellow Cards | 1–3 | 1–3 | Low/medium | Referee unknown; transition fouls can raise risk |
| Red-Card Risk | Low | Low | Low | No red card is projected |
| Offsides | 1–3 | 1–4 | Low | Waterman, Rodríguez, Musa and Perišić can attack lines |
| Saves | 3–6 | 2–4 | Medium | Panama goalkeeper likely busier |
| Crosses | 8–16 | 18–30 | Medium/high | Croatia likely use wide delivery |
| Tackles | 18–30 | 12–22 | Medium | Panama likely defend more one-vs-one actions |
| Interceptions | 12–22 | 8–15 | Medium | Panama’s block can cut central passes |
| Clearances | 26–46 | 10–20 | Medium/high | Panama may defend repeated Croatia entries |
Croatia should lead possession, shots, corners and crosses. That does not guarantee a comfortable win. Croatia must create high-value shots and stop Panama counters. Panama’s best statistics may be low-volume but important: counterattacks, fouls won, set pieces and goalkeeper saves.
If Croatia score early, the match can open. If Panama keep the match level into the final half-hour, pressure may shift toward Croatia and the underdog route strengthens.
| Match Window | Tactical State | Physical State | Card Risk | Goal Risk | Betting Market Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1’–15’ | Croatia likely control possession; Panama likely defend compactly | Mild weather supports tempo | Low/medium | Medium | First Modrić passing rhythm, first Panama counter |
| 16’–30’ | Croatia may increase left-side pressure | Physical load remains manageable | Medium | Medium | Croatia corners, Panama clearances |
| 31’–45+’ | If level, Panama belief rises; Croatia urgency increases | Fatigue limited by conditions | Medium/high | Medium | Set pieces and transition fouls |
| 46’–60’ | Dalić may adjust attacking shape; Christiansen may protect compactness | Fresh intensity after halftime | Medium | Medium/high | Croatia substitution signals, Panama counter support |
| 61’–75’ | Space may open if Croatia push | Substitutions become important | High | Medium/high | Over/under movement, Croatia pressure, Panama cards |
| 76’–90+’ | Game state dominates | Concentration becomes decisive | High | High | Draw protection, elimination-risk chase, late set pieces |
Croatia should try to show control early. Panama should stay compact and avoid conceding the first big chance. The first successful Panama counter can change Croatia’s full-back behaviour.
Croatia may push through Gvardiol and Perišić. Panama’s wing-backs must track runners and avoid early fouls. Repeated corners can show Croatia are locking Panama in.
If Panama keep the match level, pressure rises on Croatia. Dalić’s side must stay patient and avoid forcing low-value shots.
This is a key coaching window. Croatia may add a more direct attacker or adjust the midfield. Panama may decide whether to keep Waterman high or add more midfield support.
Fatigue and scoreline pressure can open spaces. Croatia may chase harder if still level. Panama may use fresh runners to protect transition threat.
The final phase can become emotional. A draw may not satisfy Croatia. Panama may protect a point or chase a famous win. Late set pieces and goalkeeper decisions become important.
| Factor | Expected Impact | Panama Effect | Croatia Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mild evening temperature | Supports repeated sprints | Helps counterattacking runs | Helps midfield pressing and circulation |
| Mostly clear / partly cloudy | Low interruption risk | Stable defensive rhythm | Stable passing rhythm |
| Open-air stadium | Wind can affect long balls and crosses | Long counters need calibration | Crosses and switches need calibration |
| Exact wind unavailable | Live adjustment required | Rodríguez/Bárcenas runs depend on pass weight | Modrić/Perišić diagonals need accuracy |
| Exact humidity unavailable | Avoid precise cramp claims | Hydration still relevant | Hydration still relevant |
| No altitude | Normal recovery profile | Supports late counters | Supports sustained possession |
| No heavy rain forecast in source set | Handling risk normal | Goalkeeper handling stable | Crossing control stable |
| Pitch speed unknown | First 10 minutes matter | Long-ball bounce matters | Short-passing tempo matters |
The most important weather factor is open-air pass calibration. Croatia will use switches and crosses. Panama will use long counter passes. Mild temperature supports both plans, but wind and pitch speed can alter execution.
| Player | Team | Role | Match Impact Score /10 | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orlando Mosquera | Panama | Goalkeeper | 8.4 | Likely faces Croatia pressure and crosses |
| José Córdoba | Panama | Centre-back | 8.5 | Main defensive organiser against Musa and set pieces |
| Amir Murillo | Panama | Wing-back | 8.1 | Must defend Perišić/Gvardiol side and counter |
| Carlos Harvey | Panama | Midfielder | 8.0 | Must replace part of Carrasquilla’s central workload |
| Cristian Martínez | Panama | Midfielder | 7.9 | Passing support and defensive screen |
| Yoel Bárcenas | Panama | Wide forward | 8.2 | Main counter outlet and delivery source |
| José Luis Rodríguez | Panama | Wide forward | 8.3 | Speed threat behind Croatia full-backs |
| Cecilio Waterman | Panama | Striker | 8.1 | Central hold-up and box target |
| Luka Modrić | Croatia | Midfielder / captain | 9.2 | 200th-cap focus and main tempo controller |
| Mateo Kovačić | Croatia | Midfielder | 8.7 | Carrying, pressure escape and central control |
| Joško Gvardiol | Croatia | Defender / left-back | 8.6 | Defensive quality and left-side progression |
| Ivan Perišić | Croatia | Winger | 8.5 | Crossing, experience and chance creation |
| Petar Musa | Croatia | Striker | 8.4 | Central penalty-box target |
| Petar Sučić | Croatia | Midfielder | 8.1 | Running support and second balls |
| Martin Baturina | Croatia | Attacker | 8.0 | Creative support and movement |
| Dominik Livaković | Croatia | Goalkeeper | 7.8 | Concentration against low-volume counters |
Waterman is Panama’s most important central attacker because he must turn clearances into controlled attacks. Musa is Croatia’s most important striker because Croatia need a central target after building possession.
Córdoba is Panama’s most important defender because he must manage Musa, crosses and second balls. Gvardiol is Croatia’s most important defender because he must attack and still protect transition spaces.
Harvey and Martínez must carry Panama’s midfield workload without Carrasquilla. Modrić remains Croatia’s most important midfielder because he controls tempo and emotional rhythm.
Panama can change the match with a fresh runner if Croatia push high. Croatia can change the match with Kramarić or another attacker if the starting structure does not create enough central threat.
Panama wing-backs and midfielders carry card risk against Perišić, Gvardiol, Modrić and Kovačić. Croatia full-backs and centre-backs carry card risk if Rodríguez and Bárcenas break into space.
Carrasquilla is unavailable. No other confirmed match-specific injury-management case is used here. Modrić’s workload is a physical watchlist because of age and role, not a confirmed injury issue.
The referee and VAR were not available from verified public data in the current source set. This discipline section uses tactical logic only.
| Discipline Factor | Forecast |
|---|---|
| Referee Style | Not available from verified public data |
| Tactical Foul Risk | Medium |
| Dissent Risk | Medium because both teams face survival pressure |
| VAR Intervention Risk | Medium |
| Penalty Risk | Medium |
| Red-Card Risk | Low |
| Team | Yellow-Card Range | Red-Card Risk | Main Risk Zone |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panama | 1–3 | Low | Wing-back and midfield zones against Croatia possession |
| Croatia | 1–3 | Low | Recovery fouls after Panama counters |
Panama may defend longer spells, so their card exposure can rise. Croatia may commit fewer fouls, but their fouls can be tactical if Panama break through transition lanes. Referee uncertainty limits precision.
| Set-Piece Area | Panama | Croatia | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corners For | Córdoba, Ramos, Waterman and Murillo attack delivery | Livaković and centre-backs defend | Balanced but lower volume |
| Corners Against | Must defend Musa, Gvardiol, Šutalo and centre-backs | Must improve after England match | Croatia by volume |
| Wide Free Kicks | Bárcenas / Martínez delivery options | Modrić / Perišić delivery options | Croatia technical edge |
| Direct Free Kicks | Panama hierarchy should be confirmed from official XI | Modrić / Perišić / Kramarić profile if selected | Croatia |
| Penalties | Taker hierarchy should be confirmed from official XI | Taker hierarchy should be confirmed from official XI | Unknown |
| Long Throws | Not available from verified public data | Not available from verified public data | Unknown |
| Aerial Duels | Waterman, Córdoba, Ramos | Musa, Gvardiol, Šutalo | Croatia slight edge |
Set pieces are important for both teams. Panama can use them to create rare high-value moments. Croatia can use them to break a compact block. Dalić’s comments after England make this area especially important for Croatia’s defensive focus.
| Area | Panama | Croatia |
|---|---|---|
| Goalkeeper Distribution | Mosquera likely uses long outlets under pressure | Livaković supports controlled buildup |
| Shot-Stopping Pressure | Medium/high | Low/medium |
| Cross Handling | High against Perišić and Modrić deliveries | Medium against Panama set pieces |
| High-Line Risk | Low if Panama sit deep | Medium/high if Croatia push full-backs |
| Penalty-Box Defending | Must track Musa, Perišić, Gvardiol and second runners | Must track Waterman, Rodríguez and Bárcenas |
| Back-Post Weakness | Possible against Croatia switches | Possible if Gvardiol or Stanišić overadvance |
| Defensive Communication | Constant under Croatia pressure | Critical after lost balls and counters |
Mosquera may face more pressure because Croatia should create more shots and crosses. Livaković may face fewer shots, but Panama’s chances can be sudden and high-value. Both goalkeepers must manage set pieces and rebounds.
| Minute Window | Panama Possible Change | Croatia Possible Change | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45’–60’ | Add midfield legs or fresh counter runner | Add Kramarić, more attacking midfield support or adjust full-backs | Scoreline and chance quality |
| 60’–75’ | Add defensive wing-back or direct forward | Add striker support or more width | Fatigue and urgency |
| 75’–90’ | Protect draw/lead or chase with long balls | Chase winner with extra attacker or protect lead with midfield | Group math and elimination pressure |
Panama will likely defend deeper and use wide counters. They must avoid giving Croatia repeated corners and free kicks. Fresh defensive legs will matter.
Croatia should control the ball and avoid transition errors. They may still chase another goal because goal difference matters, but defensive balance should come first.
Pressure shifts toward Croatia. Panama may value a draw but still need a win at some point. Croatia may push harder. That creates counter space for Panama.
| Market | Current Signal | Main Risk |
|—|—|
| Match Winner | Croatia favourite | Panama counterattacks and Croatia defensive issues |
| Double Chance | Croatia or draw likely shorter | Limited value if favourite price is compressed |
| Over/Under Goals | Public total around 2.5 goals | Croatia pressure supports over; Panama low block supports under |
| BTTS | Plausible but not automatic | Panama may have low shot volume without Carrasquilla |
| Corners | Croatia corner volume likely higher | Early Croatia goal can reduce pressure volume |
| Cards | Medium | Survival pressure and transition fouls |
| Player Shots | Musa, Perišić, Modrić, Waterman, Rodríguez, Bárcenas watchlist | Official XI and live score matter |
| Player Cards | Panama wing-backs, Croatia recovery defenders | Referee threshold unknown |
| Main Betting Risk | Croatia price may overstate safety | Croatia still need defensive repair |
| Main Market Uncertainty | Carrasquilla absence and Croatia formation choice | Both affect possession and total-goals paths |
| Trigger | Possible Market Effect |
|---|---|
| Official Croatia formation | 4-3-3 vs 4-2-3-1 can alter attacking output |
| Kramarić starting | Could raise Croatia chance-creation expectation |
| Carrasquilla confirmed absent | Weakens Panama midfield control |
| Panama defensive shape | Back five lowers tempo and may raise Croatia corner markets |
| Referee announcement | Can move card and penalty markets |
| Weather / wind update | Can affect crossing and long-ball markets |
| England vs Ghana result | Can affect elimination pressure and late-game incentives |
| Public Croatia money | Can shorten favourite price |
| Trigger | Meaning | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia create early central shots | Favourite model strengthens | Panama may still counter if Croatia overcommit |
| Modrić controls tempo freely | Croatia possession value rises | Possession must become chance quality |
| Panama complete early counters | Underdog route becomes live | One counter can overstate balance |
| Croatia only create blocked crosses | Panama low-block model works | Corner count can rise without goals |
| 0-0 after 60’ | Pressure rises on Croatia | Croatia bench can still change match |
| Panama wing-back booked | Croatia wide attack becomes stronger | Referee threshold may affect both teams |
This preview explains match data and market behavior. It does not provide guaranteed betting advice. World Cup betting involves risk. Readers should check local gambling laws, use licensed operators, set limits and avoid chasing losses.
| Factor | How It Can Break the Forecast |
|---|---|
| Late Lineup Change | Croatia formation or Panama counter structure can change the match |
| Early Goal | Forces one team away from base plan |
| Early Yellow Card | Changes wide defending and transition control |
| Injury | Can remove a key outlet, midfielder or centre-back |
| VAR Penalty | Creates a non-pattern goal |
| Weather Shift | Wind or pitch speed can alter crosses and long balls |
| Red Card | Makes possession and xG ranges much less useful |
| Goalkeeper Error | Can swing a survival match |
| Tactical Surprise | Panama may press higher or Croatia may play more direct |
| Market Overreaction | Croatia possession may shorten prices without clean chance quality |
The forecast can fail if Panama score first and force Croatia into rushed attacks. It can also fail if Croatia score early and Panama must open the match. A red card, penalty, goalkeeper mistake, set piece, injury or tactical surprise can break the pre-match model.
| Scenario | Probability Band | Match Story |
|---|---|---|
| Panama Narrow Win | Low/medium | Panama defend compactly, score through counterattack or set piece and survive pressure |
| Draw | Medium | Croatia control possession but struggle to create enough clean chances |
| Croatia Win | Medium/high | Croatia improve defensive balance and turn midfield control into goals |
| High-Scoring Match | Medium | Early goal opens the game and both teams chase survival |
| Low-Scoring Match | Medium | Panama block central lanes and Croatia possession becomes slow |
The safest scenario frame is Croatia-favoured but not Croatia-certain. Croatia have midfield quality, tournament experience and stronger market support. Panama have a clear route through compact defending, transitions and the pressure that grows on favourites in must-win games.
| Result | Panama Impact | Croatia Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Panama Win | Panama move to three points and keep a historic qualification route alive before England | Croatia stay on zero points and face severe pressure before Ghana |
| Draw | Panama move to one point and remain alive but exposed | Croatia move to one point and remain alive but under pressure |
| Croatia Win | Panama stay on zero points and likely need a major final-round result | Croatia move to three points and revive top-two or third-place hopes |
Three points would revive either side. One point would keep hope alive but leave a difficult final match. Zero points after two matches would be severe. Goal difference remains important because the best third-placed teams can qualify.
| Data Point | Status | Source Type |
|---|---|---|
| Match Date | Confirmed | FIFA match centre / fixture listing |
| Kick-off Time | Confirmed | FIFA match centre / time-zone conversion |
| Stadium | Confirmed | FIFA / Reuters match page |
| City | Confirmed | FIFA / Reuters venue context |
| Group | Confirmed | FIFA / Reuters Group L context |
| Panama Opener Result | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Croatia Opener Result | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Panama Coach | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Croatia Coach | Confirmed | Reuters reporting |
| Carrasquilla Status | Confirmed unavailable | Reuters pre-match report |
| Croatia Defensive Focus | Confirmed reporting | Reuters pre-match report |
| Modrić 200th-cap Context | Confirmed reporting | Reuters pre-match report |
| Referee | Pending | Not available from verified public data |
| VAR | Pending | Not available from verified public data |
| Weather | Forecast | Weather service |
| Pitch Condition | Forecast / pending | Exact pitch speed not available from verified public data |
| Lineups | Projected | Public lineup previews and editorial tactical model |
| Injuries | Partly known | Carrasquilla unavailable; other unknowns marked |
| Odds | Market-signal only | Public odds and market snapshots |
| Projected Stats | Model-based | Editorial projection using opener context and tactical matchup |
| Minute-Window Scenarios | Scenario-based | Editorial model, not factual prediction |
This dossier uses confirmed information where available and marks unknown data clearly. It does not invent official starting XIs, expected attendance, referee assignment, VAR assignment, exact pitch speed, exact wind, unverified injuries or unverified suspensions.
This preview is analytical and informational. The forecast is not a guarantee. Football includes randomness and low-probability events. Final lineups, injuries, referee decisions, VAR, weather and early goals can change the match.
Projected statistics, scoreline scenarios and betting market notes are probability-based estimates. Panama can have less possession and still win through a counterattack, set piece or goalkeeper error. Croatia can dominate the ball and still fail to win if they repeat defensive mistakes or create low-quality shots. A red card, penalty, deflection, injury, wind shift, tactical surprise or late substitution can break the pre-match model.
Betting markets move before and during the match. Readers should verify official lineups, injuries, referee information, weather conditions, pitch condition and market prices before making decisions. Readers should check local gambling laws. Readers should use licensed operators only. Readers should set spending and time limits. Readers should not chase losses. Betting should be treated as entertainment, not income.
This article does not provide guaranteed betting advice, fixed-match information, insider tips, prediction tools, risk-free picks or certain outcomes.
Panama vs Croatia is scheduled for Tuesday, 23 June 2026. Kick-off is 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time in Toronto and 23:00 UTC.
Panama vs Croatia is being played at Toronto Stadium in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The common venue context is BMO Field.
Panama are projected to use Orlando Mosquera, César Blackman, José Córdoba, Jiovany Ramos, Amir Murillo, Carlos Harvey, Cristian Martínez, Andrés Andrade, Yoel Bárcenas, Cecilio Waterman and José Luis Rodríguez. Croatia are projected to use Dominik Livaković, Josip Stanišić, Josip Šutalo, Duje Ćaleta-Car or Luka Vušković, Joško Gvardiol, Mateo Kovačić, Luka Modrić, Petar Sučić, Martin Baturina or Andrej Kramarić, Petar Musa and Ivan Perišić.
The main tactical matchup is Croatia’s Modrić-Kovačić midfield control and wide delivery against Panama’s compact back five and counterattacking speed through Rodríguez, Bárcenas and Waterman.
The prediction can be wrong because late lineup changes, early goals, yellow cards, injuries, VAR penalties, red cards, goalkeeper errors, wind, pitch speed, set pieces and unexpected tactical decisions can change the match. This preview uses probability logic, not certainty.
[expert_review params=»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»]